Search a title or topic

Over 20 million podcasts, powered by 

Player FM logo
Artwork

Content provided by Not On Record Podcast and Possibly Correct Media. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Not On Record Podcast and Possibly Correct Media or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://podcastplayer.com/legal.
Player FM - Podcast App
Go offline with the Player FM app!

EP#182 | Analysis of a Child's Evidence in a Sexual Interference Case

31:19
 
Share
 

Manage episode 506333085 series 3417894
Content provided by Not On Record Podcast and Possibly Correct Media. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Not On Record Podcast and Possibly Correct Media or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://podcastplayer.com/legal.
Sponsored by EasyDNS https://easydns.com/NotOnRecord In this solo episode, Joseph breaks down R. v. D.D., 2025 ONCJ 355 (Sudbury) to show how courts assess child-complainant evidence in sexual interference cases covering the s. 715.1 video-statement rule, the dangers of leading questions, gaps around initial disclosure, and the W.(D.) framework for credibility vs. reliability that ultimately produced an acquittal on reasonable doubt. Along the way he offers practical defence insights (why “no opportunity” absolutes backfire, how to mine inconsistencies between in-court testimony and the video) and a quick primer on how judges tailor reliability analysis for young witnesses without lowering the burden of proof. It’s an instructive case study shaped by viewer questions delivered with a bit of levity (a nod to Ghostbusters and Mr. Stay Puft) and supported by our friends at EasyDNS.
  continue reading

185 episodes

Artwork
iconShare
 
Manage episode 506333085 series 3417894
Content provided by Not On Record Podcast and Possibly Correct Media. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Not On Record Podcast and Possibly Correct Media or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://podcastplayer.com/legal.
Sponsored by EasyDNS https://easydns.com/NotOnRecord In this solo episode, Joseph breaks down R. v. D.D., 2025 ONCJ 355 (Sudbury) to show how courts assess child-complainant evidence in sexual interference cases covering the s. 715.1 video-statement rule, the dangers of leading questions, gaps around initial disclosure, and the W.(D.) framework for credibility vs. reliability that ultimately produced an acquittal on reasonable doubt. Along the way he offers practical defence insights (why “no opportunity” absolutes backfire, how to mine inconsistencies between in-court testimony and the video) and a quick primer on how judges tailor reliability analysis for young witnesses without lowering the burden of proof. It’s an instructive case study shaped by viewer questions delivered with a bit of levity (a nod to Ghostbusters and Mr. Stay Puft) and supported by our friends at EasyDNS.
  continue reading

185 episodes

All episodes

×
 
Loading …

Welcome to Player FM!

Player FM is scanning the web for high-quality podcasts for you to enjoy right now. It's the best podcast app and works on Android, iPhone, and the web. Signup to sync subscriptions across devices.

 

Copyright 2025 | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | | Copyright
Listen to this show while you explore
Play