Search a title or topic

Over 20 million podcasts, powered by 

Player FM logo
Artwork

Content provided by The IILAH podcast, Institute of International Law, and The Humanities. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by The IILAH podcast, Institute of International Law, and The Humanities or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://podcastplayer.com/legal.
Player FM - Podcast App
Go offline with the Player FM app!

Daniel McLoughlin: Useless for Fascism? (Seminar)

1:00:24
 
Share
 

Manage episode 485726880 series 3266644
Content provided by The IILAH podcast, Institute of International Law, and The Humanities. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by The IILAH podcast, Institute of International Law, and The Humanities or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://podcastplayer.com/legal.
Useless for Fascism? Giorgio Agamben's Covid Critique and the Homo Sacer project In this episode of the IILAH Podcast, Daniel McLoughlin (University of New South Wales) presented on Giorgio Agamben's Covid Critique and the Homo Sacer project. This seminar was chaired by Dr Richard Joyce. On the 26th of February 2020, Giorgio Agamben published a short piece on his personal website, entitled ‘Invention of an Epidemic,’ which argued that the Italian state was exploiting the appearance of COVID-19 to govern by emergency decree. Over the following year, he went on to criticise the use of masks, compared the “Green Pass” to the Yellow Star, and argued that academics teaching online were the “perfect equivalent” of Nazi collaborators. Agamben’s work has been enormously influential in critical legal theory over the past two decades. However, these interventions generated a great deal of criticism, with commentators accusing him of peddling “critical-cum-conspiracy theory,” and urging us to “forget about Agamben.” This paper analyses Agamben’s interventions around the pandemic and their relationship to his philosophical critique of law and politics. It argues that they illustrate limits to his analysis of sovereignty and his concern with the politics of totalitarianism, as they have the potential to play into a politics that presupposes a virtuous liberal status quo that has been lost and needs to be restored. There are, however, two aspects of Agamben’s thought in the Homo Sacer project that mitigate against this conceptual danger: his deconstruction of the concepts that underpin the legitimacy of the modern democratic state; and his analysis of the relationship between liberal democracy, biopolitics, and governmentality. Daniel McLoughlin's claim is that these issues, taken together, have generated the much-noted proximity between Agamben’s critique of the response to COVID, and that of the far right.
  continue reading

51 episodes

Artwork
iconShare
 
Manage episode 485726880 series 3266644
Content provided by The IILAH podcast, Institute of International Law, and The Humanities. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by The IILAH podcast, Institute of International Law, and The Humanities or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://podcastplayer.com/legal.
Useless for Fascism? Giorgio Agamben's Covid Critique and the Homo Sacer project In this episode of the IILAH Podcast, Daniel McLoughlin (University of New South Wales) presented on Giorgio Agamben's Covid Critique and the Homo Sacer project. This seminar was chaired by Dr Richard Joyce. On the 26th of February 2020, Giorgio Agamben published a short piece on his personal website, entitled ‘Invention of an Epidemic,’ which argued that the Italian state was exploiting the appearance of COVID-19 to govern by emergency decree. Over the following year, he went on to criticise the use of masks, compared the “Green Pass” to the Yellow Star, and argued that academics teaching online were the “perfect equivalent” of Nazi collaborators. Agamben’s work has been enormously influential in critical legal theory over the past two decades. However, these interventions generated a great deal of criticism, with commentators accusing him of peddling “critical-cum-conspiracy theory,” and urging us to “forget about Agamben.” This paper analyses Agamben’s interventions around the pandemic and their relationship to his philosophical critique of law and politics. It argues that they illustrate limits to his analysis of sovereignty and his concern with the politics of totalitarianism, as they have the potential to play into a politics that presupposes a virtuous liberal status quo that has been lost and needs to be restored. There are, however, two aspects of Agamben’s thought in the Homo Sacer project that mitigate against this conceptual danger: his deconstruction of the concepts that underpin the legitimacy of the modern democratic state; and his analysis of the relationship between liberal democracy, biopolitics, and governmentality. Daniel McLoughlin's claim is that these issues, taken together, have generated the much-noted proximity between Agamben’s critique of the response to COVID, and that of the far right.
  continue reading

51 episodes

Tüm bölümler

×
 
Loading …

Welcome to Player FM!

Player FM is scanning the web for high-quality podcasts for you to enjoy right now. It's the best podcast app and works on Android, iPhone, and the web. Signup to sync subscriptions across devices.

 

Copyright 2025 | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | | Copyright
Listen to this show while you explore
Play