Evaluating Science: Clinical Trials, Epidemiology, Preclinical Studies & Mendelian Randomization | George Davey Smith

Content provided by Nick Jikomes. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Nick Jikomes or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.

Mind & Matter »
Evaluating Science: Clinical Trials, Epidemiology, Preclinical Studies & Mendelian Randomization | George Davey Smith | 265

1d ago 1:26:16

MP3•Episode home

Send us a text

Methods & challenges of establishing causal relationships in health research, emphasizing epidemiology, randomized trials, and genetic approaches.

Topics:

Epidemiology: Studies disease influences using observational designs like case-control and prospective cohorts, plus trials, to identify patterns and test hypotheses.
Hierarchy of evidence critique: Rejects rigid pyramids favoring RCTs, as all studies can be biased; advocates triangulation integrating varied data types for robust conclusions.
RCT strengths & weaknesses: Randomization balances confounders, but issues like poor blinding, attrition, or subversion can undermine results; large samples may yield spurious precision if biased.
Confounding & reverse causation: Examples include yellow fingers and lung cancer (both from smoking) or early atherosclerosis inflating CRP-disease links; hard to fully control statistically.
Nutrition epidemiology: Observational studies often overstate benefits (e.g., vitamin E for heart disease), leading to failed trials; incentives favor new findings over revisiting errors.
Mendelian randomization: Uses genetic variants as proxies for exposures (e.g., ALDH2 for alcohol metabolism) to mimic randomization; reveals no heart benefits from alcohol, unlike observational data.
Negative controls: Tests implausible outcomes (e.g., smoking and murder) or exposures (e.g., paternal smoking in pregnancy) to check for confounding artifacts.
Evidence triangulation: Combines diverse studies with different biases (e.g., cross-cultural comparisons) for causality; applied to dismiss HDL-raising drugs despite initial promise.

Practical Takeaways:

Scrutinize health claims by checking for negative controls or variety in evidence sources to avoid mistaking correlation for causation.
For personal decisions like alcohol intake, consider genetic studies showing risks at all levels, and aim for moderation or abstinence based on overall evidence.
When evaluating supplements or diets, prioritize trials over observational data, and question media hype that ignores confounding factors.

About the guest: Dr. George Davey Smith, MD, DSc is a professor of clinical epidemiology at the University of Bristol and director of the MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit.

*Not medical advice.

Support the show

Affiliates:

Lumen device to optimize your metabolism for weight loss or athletic performance. MINDMATTER gets you 15% off.
AquaTru: Water filtration devices that remove microplastics, metals, bacteria, and more from your drinking water. Through link, $100 off AquaTru Carafe, Classic & Under Sink Units; $300 off Freestanding models.
Seed Oil Scout: Find restaurants with seed oil-free options, scan food products to see what they’re hiding, with this easy-to-use mobile app.
KetoCitra—Ketone body BHB + electrolytes formulated for kidney health. Use code MIND20 for 20% off any subscription (cancel anytime)

For all the ways you can support my efforts

269 episodes

#Science #Society #Nick Jikomes #Biotechnology #Brain #Neuroscience #Consciousness #Biology #Podcasting Education #Drug #Psychedelic #Health and Well-Being #Metabolism #Diet #Medicine #Food