Robots in copyright and trademark cases / S1E2: AI

Copycast by CLAIMS

Over 20 million podcasts, powered by

Content provided by CLAIMS, Victor Gorsky-Mochalov, and Anton Endresyak. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by CLAIMS, Victor Gorsky-Mochalov, and Anton Endresyak or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://podcastplayer.com/legal.

2+ y ago 17:41

MP3•Episode home

🤖 Does content generating soft like Stable Diffusion or Midjourney violate copyright to works used for machine learning? That is the issue raised in the Getty Images v. Stability AI, as well as in a few of other cases of 2023.

We have overviewed this legal dispute and found out: what exactly Getty Images claimed in the lawsuit? Can AI be a copyright infringer or copyright owner? And how AI impacts on legal professionals?

Key moments:

00:00 - Go!

01:39 - Getty Images v. Stability AI: the brief overview

03:00 - How Stable Diffusion allegedly violated the trademark of Getty Images

05:27 - Machine learning on artists' works: is it fair? and what EU regulation says?

08:54 - The judge who used AI to write a decision

12:47 - Are AI generated pictures protected by copyright?

14:43 - What developers of AI write about copyright in Terms of Use

Video:https://youtu.be/xHKBl76eZQQ

7 episodes