Search a title or topic

Over 20 million podcasts, powered by 

Player FM logo
Artwork

Content provided by CDA Institute. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by CDA Institute or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://podcastplayer.com/legal.
Player FM - Podcast App
Go offline with the Player FM app!

2025 Election: Comparing Conservative and Liberal Defence Platforms

26:18
 
Share
 

Manage episode 515187457 series 3697217
Content provided by CDA Institute. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by CDA Institute or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://podcastplayer.com/legal.

What are Canada’s major political parties promising when it comes to defence, sovereignty, and foreign policy—and where do key questions and challenges remain?

In today’s Expert Series episode, Vincent Rigby compares the two major party platforms on defence and security issues. Together, we highlight three crucial areas from both aspects of the Liberal and Conservative platforms: the commitment to 2% defence spending, sovereignty, and Canada’s foreign policy.

The first of these issues is the “black and white” commitment to NATO 2%. While both parties have committed to meeting NATO 2% by 2030 with differing approaches, Rigby cautions that guidelines will change in coming years and that 2% may no longer be sufficient without long-term planning to increase defence spending.

The second aspect we discuss is the platforms’ focus on sovereignty. Amidst plans for funding directed towards the Arctic through procurement or CFB development, Rigby cautions stepping away from American cooperation and negating the F-35 deal. Though he recommends the diversification and cooperation with the Indo-Pacific and Europe, this diversification cannot be done without bilateral cooperation.

To close our discussion, we explore the creation of a foreign policy plan that centers Canadians engagement in humanitarian aid. Rigby heavily cautions against cutting funding to UNAID and recommends efficient and well-thought-out foreign policy to guide Canadian relations amidst an evolving international landscape.

Don’t miss an episode – subscribe to the CDA Institute newsletter today:
https://bit.ly/40ykggq

The CDA Institute is a non-partisan think tank that conducts research and education programming on defence and security.

Learn more: CDA Institute

  continue reading

98 episodes

Artwork
iconShare
 
Manage episode 515187457 series 3697217
Content provided by CDA Institute. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by CDA Institute or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://podcastplayer.com/legal.

What are Canada’s major political parties promising when it comes to defence, sovereignty, and foreign policy—and where do key questions and challenges remain?

In today’s Expert Series episode, Vincent Rigby compares the two major party platforms on defence and security issues. Together, we highlight three crucial areas from both aspects of the Liberal and Conservative platforms: the commitment to 2% defence spending, sovereignty, and Canada’s foreign policy.

The first of these issues is the “black and white” commitment to NATO 2%. While both parties have committed to meeting NATO 2% by 2030 with differing approaches, Rigby cautions that guidelines will change in coming years and that 2% may no longer be sufficient without long-term planning to increase defence spending.

The second aspect we discuss is the platforms’ focus on sovereignty. Amidst plans for funding directed towards the Arctic through procurement or CFB development, Rigby cautions stepping away from American cooperation and negating the F-35 deal. Though he recommends the diversification and cooperation with the Indo-Pacific and Europe, this diversification cannot be done without bilateral cooperation.

To close our discussion, we explore the creation of a foreign policy plan that centers Canadians engagement in humanitarian aid. Rigby heavily cautions against cutting funding to UNAID and recommends efficient and well-thought-out foreign policy to guide Canadian relations amidst an evolving international landscape.

Don’t miss an episode – subscribe to the CDA Institute newsletter today:
https://bit.ly/40ykggq

The CDA Institute is a non-partisan think tank that conducts research and education programming on defence and security.

Learn more: CDA Institute

  continue reading

98 episodes

All episodes

×
 
Loading …

Welcome to Player FM!

Player FM is scanning the web for high-quality podcasts for you to enjoy right now. It's the best podcast app and works on Android, iPhone, and the web. Signup to sync subscriptions across devices.

 

Copyright 2025 | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | | Copyright
Listen to this show while you explore
Play