Search a title or topic

Over 20 million podcasts, powered by 

Player FM logo
Artwork

Content provided by Clauses & Controversies, Mitu Gulati, and Mark Weidemaier. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Clauses & Controversies, Mitu Gulati, and Mark Weidemaier or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://podcastplayer.com/legal.
Player FM - Podcast App
Go offline with the Player FM app!

Ep 158 ft. Mitu & Mark

48:31
 
Share
 

Manage episode 485451414 series 2911580
Content provided by Clauses & Controversies, Mitu Gulati, and Mark Weidemaier. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Clauses & Controversies, Mitu Gulati, and Mark Weidemaier or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://podcastplayer.com/legal.
Some Questions, Now That it's About 3 Years Since Russia’s Default It has now been around 3 years since Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, which prompted EU and US sanctions and a default on Russia’s external bonds. The prescription clause in these bonds says that Russia’s obligations become void unless investors make claims within three years of the date payment is due. What does it mean to “make” a “claim”? Filing a lawsuit would do the trick. What about an email requesting payment? An automated message, which the depository sends out every payment date? Should bondholders have sought an agreement tolling the prescription period? Since they didn't, does Russia now have what amounts to an option to pay past due amounts? And what about interest on unpaid amounts? Does Russia owe interest on payments that were impossible to make due to sanctions? Producer: Leanna Doty
  continue reading

160 episodes

Artwork

Ep 158 ft. Mitu & Mark

Clauses & Controversies

21 subscribers

published

iconShare
 
Manage episode 485451414 series 2911580
Content provided by Clauses & Controversies, Mitu Gulati, and Mark Weidemaier. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Clauses & Controversies, Mitu Gulati, and Mark Weidemaier or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://podcastplayer.com/legal.
Some Questions, Now That it's About 3 Years Since Russia’s Default It has now been around 3 years since Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, which prompted EU and US sanctions and a default on Russia’s external bonds. The prescription clause in these bonds says that Russia’s obligations become void unless investors make claims within three years of the date payment is due. What does it mean to “make” a “claim”? Filing a lawsuit would do the trick. What about an email requesting payment? An automated message, which the depository sends out every payment date? Should bondholders have sought an agreement tolling the prescription period? Since they didn't, does Russia now have what amounts to an option to pay past due amounts? And what about interest on unpaid amounts? Does Russia owe interest on payments that were impossible to make due to sanctions? Producer: Leanna Doty
  continue reading

160 episodes

All episodes

×
 
Loading …

Welcome to Player FM!

Player FM is scanning the web for high-quality podcasts for you to enjoy right now. It's the best podcast app and works on Android, iPhone, and the web. Signup to sync subscriptions across devices.

 

Copyright 2025 | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | | Copyright
Listen to this show while you explore
Play