#168 - Judicial Review AMA

Borderlines

Content provided by Borderlines, Steven Meurrens, and Deanna Okun-Nachoff. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Borderlines, Steven Meurrens, and Deanna Okun-Nachoff or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://podcastplayer.com/legal.

25d ago 1:01:38

MP3•Episode home

Immigration lawyer Lev Abramovich returns to discuss frequently asked questions regarding judicial review. This episode offers valuable guidance for legal professionals, consultants, and those navigating immigration processes.

Topics Addressed:

(1:49) The IRGC

(6:32) Bill C-2

(10:48) What is judicial review, and how does it differ from an appeal?

(13:30) When faced with an H&C refusal, what factors determine whether to reapply or seek judicial review?

(19:29) How do you proceed with a judicial review of a Chinook refusal when GCMS notes repeat the refusal letter?

(27:33) When should someone use mandamus, and what factors influence this decision?

(36:37) Why is there a lack of legislation to enforce compliance with federal court decisions or settlements, and how often are files refused again after judicial review?

(43:51) Is the Immigration Division’s interpretation of the law subject to judicial review?

(44:43) How long does it take to decide whether to file a judicial review?

(45:54) What’s the difference between Rule 9 and GCMS notes in preparing a judicial review?

(50:16) Can you file a judicial review for a study permit refusal from three months ago?

(52:50) Should you pursue a judicial review for an application where a reconsideration request was already made?

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

180 episodes

#News #Steven Meurrens #Immigration #Society #Borderline #Deanna Okun-Nachoff

#168 - Judicial Review AMA

Borderlines

47 subscribers

published 25d ago