Search a title or topic

Over 20 million podcasts, powered by 

Player FM logo
Artwork

Content provided by Commonwealth Partners. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Commonwealth Partners or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://podcastplayer.com/legal.
Player FM - Podcast App
Go offline with the Player FM app!

#55 How You're Being Lied to with Statistics

5:39
 
Share
 

Manage episode 496078798 series 3553345
Content provided by Commonwealth Partners. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Commonwealth Partners or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://podcastplayer.com/legal.

Historical Context:

  • 1965: Darrell Huff testified before U.S. Senate about misleading statistics
  • Author of "How to Lie with Statistics" - best-selling statistics book ever
  • Secret: Tobacco industry paid him to discredit smoking-cancer studies
  • Was working on unpublished book: "How to Lie with Smoking Statistics"

Three Quick Tests to Spot Misleading Stats:

1. The Zoom Test

  • Ask: How different would this number look if I zoomed in or out?
  • Consider different time frames, geography, or demographics
  • Would the trend hold with more context?

2. The Crop Test

  • Ask: What's missing from the frame?
  • What's been left out that would change your perspective?
  • Look for omitted context or qualifying information

3. The Source Test

  • Ask: Who took the picture?
  • Check incentives of data collectors/presenters
  • Be wary when same entity collects and presents data

Real Example - Shapiro Administration Claim:

  • Claim: "300,000 Pennsylvanians could lose health coverage"
  • Zoom Test: Used highest possible estimate
  • Crop Test: Includes healthy adults who could work 20 hours/week will not to keep their benefits; includes ineligible people removed from Medicaid
  • Source Test: Data from administration supporting their own argument

Final Gut Check:

  • Ask: Do I want this data to be true?
  • We're most easily fooled when numbers confirm our hopes
  • Be especially skeptical of data that supports what you already believe

Bottom Line: You can't stop people from twisting numbers, but you can prevent them from tricking you.

Sources: U.S. Senate Commerce Committee Hearings (1965); Reinhart, Alex. "Huff and Puff" Significance (2014)

For more tips on evaluating statistical claims, refer to the accompanying one-page PDF.

Winning Edge gives you the tools you need to lead and influence in the political and policy arenas. Every other week, Winning Edge releases short (approximately 5-minute) spots—or “snacks”—focused on one of four areas: fundraising, media, policy, or persuasion.
For more, visit our website: www.thecommonwealthpartners.com

  continue reading

57 episodes

Artwork
iconShare
 
Manage episode 496078798 series 3553345
Content provided by Commonwealth Partners. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Commonwealth Partners or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://podcastplayer.com/legal.

Historical Context:

  • 1965: Darrell Huff testified before U.S. Senate about misleading statistics
  • Author of "How to Lie with Statistics" - best-selling statistics book ever
  • Secret: Tobacco industry paid him to discredit smoking-cancer studies
  • Was working on unpublished book: "How to Lie with Smoking Statistics"

Three Quick Tests to Spot Misleading Stats:

1. The Zoom Test

  • Ask: How different would this number look if I zoomed in or out?
  • Consider different time frames, geography, or demographics
  • Would the trend hold with more context?

2. The Crop Test

  • Ask: What's missing from the frame?
  • What's been left out that would change your perspective?
  • Look for omitted context or qualifying information

3. The Source Test

  • Ask: Who took the picture?
  • Check incentives of data collectors/presenters
  • Be wary when same entity collects and presents data

Real Example - Shapiro Administration Claim:

  • Claim: "300,000 Pennsylvanians could lose health coverage"
  • Zoom Test: Used highest possible estimate
  • Crop Test: Includes healthy adults who could work 20 hours/week will not to keep their benefits; includes ineligible people removed from Medicaid
  • Source Test: Data from administration supporting their own argument

Final Gut Check:

  • Ask: Do I want this data to be true?
  • We're most easily fooled when numbers confirm our hopes
  • Be especially skeptical of data that supports what you already believe

Bottom Line: You can't stop people from twisting numbers, but you can prevent them from tricking you.

Sources: U.S. Senate Commerce Committee Hearings (1965); Reinhart, Alex. "Huff and Puff" Significance (2014)

For more tips on evaluating statistical claims, refer to the accompanying one-page PDF.

Winning Edge gives you the tools you need to lead and influence in the political and policy arenas. Every other week, Winning Edge releases short (approximately 5-minute) spots—or “snacks”—focused on one of four areas: fundraising, media, policy, or persuasion.
For more, visit our website: www.thecommonwealthpartners.com

  continue reading

57 episodes

All episodes

×
 
Loading …

Welcome to Player FM!

Player FM is scanning the web for high-quality podcasts for you to enjoy right now. It's the best podcast app and works on Android, iPhone, and the web. Signup to sync subscriptions across devices.

 

Copyright 2025 | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | | Copyright
Listen to this show while you explore
Play