Search a title or topic

Over 20 million podcasts, powered by 

Player FM logo
Artwork

Content provided by Mel Gilcrist, Meg Brodtmann, Mel Gilcrist, and Meg Brodtmann. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Mel Gilcrist, Meg Brodtmann, Mel Gilcrist, and Meg Brodtmann or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.
Player FM - Podcast App
Go offline with the Player FM app!

Who am I meant to listen to? The truth about wine ratings with guests: Huon Hooke, Max Allen and Michael Anderson

1:13:43
 
Share
 

Manage episode 508634970 series 2947782
Content provided by Mel Gilcrist, Meg Brodtmann, Mel Gilcrist, and Meg Brodtmann. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Mel Gilcrist, Meg Brodtmann, Mel Gilcrist, and Meg Brodtmann or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://podcastplayer.com/legal.

Send us a text

Wine scoring systems have proliferated, leaving many consumers confused about who to trust when choosing their next bottle. We break down the differences between wine shows, critic ratings, classifications, and journalistic approaches to help you navigate the complex world of wine recommendations.
• Wine shows use panels of expert judges who taste wines blind, scoring on a 100-point scale
• Judges award bronze (85-89), silver (90-94), and gold (95+) medals based on technical merit
• The Real Review groups wines by variety for comparative tasting, with critics having freedom to taste non-blind
• Halliday Wine Companion uses regional specialists who focus on terroir-specific excellence
• Langton's Classification is data-driven, ranking wines based on auction performance and collector demand
• Wine writer Max Allen avoids scoring altogether, focusing on storytelling and context
• Regional wine shows offer valuable insight into local specialties
• Personal preferences should ultimately guide your wine choices
To find wines you'll truly enjoy, consider which approach aligns with your own preferences and use these systems as helpful guides rather than definitive judgments.
Follow us on instagram @winewithmegandmel

  continue reading

Chapters

1. Who am I meant to listen to? The truth about wine ratings with guests: Huon Hooke, Max Allen and Michael Anderson (00:00:00)

2. Episode Introduction (00:00:26)

3. Understanding Wine Shows and Judging (00:03:40)

4. The Real Review with Huon Hooke (00:19:56)

5. Halliday Wine Companion Overview (00:28:17)

6. Langton's Classification with Michael Anderson (00:33:05)

7. Wine Journalism with Max Allen (00:42:52)

8. Making Sense of Wine Recommendations (00:53:45)

9. Personal Approaches to Wine Selection (01:08:09)

195 episodes

Artwork
iconShare
 
Manage episode 508634970 series 2947782
Content provided by Mel Gilcrist, Meg Brodtmann, Mel Gilcrist, and Meg Brodtmann. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Mel Gilcrist, Meg Brodtmann, Mel Gilcrist, and Meg Brodtmann or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://podcastplayer.com/legal.

Send us a text

Wine scoring systems have proliferated, leaving many consumers confused about who to trust when choosing their next bottle. We break down the differences between wine shows, critic ratings, classifications, and journalistic approaches to help you navigate the complex world of wine recommendations.
• Wine shows use panels of expert judges who taste wines blind, scoring on a 100-point scale
• Judges award bronze (85-89), silver (90-94), and gold (95+) medals based on technical merit
• The Real Review groups wines by variety for comparative tasting, with critics having freedom to taste non-blind
• Halliday Wine Companion uses regional specialists who focus on terroir-specific excellence
• Langton's Classification is data-driven, ranking wines based on auction performance and collector demand
• Wine writer Max Allen avoids scoring altogether, focusing on storytelling and context
• Regional wine shows offer valuable insight into local specialties
• Personal preferences should ultimately guide your wine choices
To find wines you'll truly enjoy, consider which approach aligns with your own preferences and use these systems as helpful guides rather than definitive judgments.
Follow us on instagram @winewithmegandmel

  continue reading

Chapters

1. Who am I meant to listen to? The truth about wine ratings with guests: Huon Hooke, Max Allen and Michael Anderson (00:00:00)

2. Episode Introduction (00:00:26)

3. Understanding Wine Shows and Judging (00:03:40)

4. The Real Review with Huon Hooke (00:19:56)

5. Halliday Wine Companion Overview (00:28:17)

6. Langton's Classification with Michael Anderson (00:33:05)

7. Wine Journalism with Max Allen (00:42:52)

8. Making Sense of Wine Recommendations (00:53:45)

9. Personal Approaches to Wine Selection (01:08:09)

195 episodes

All episodes

×
 
Loading …

Welcome to Player FM!

Player FM is scanning the web for high-quality podcasts for you to enjoy right now. It's the best podcast app and works on Android, iPhone, and the web. Signup to sync subscriptions across devices.

 

Copyright 2025 | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | | Copyright
Listen to this show while you explore
Play