Search a title or topic

Over 20 million podcasts, powered by 

Player FM logo
Artwork

Content provided by Jonathan Brooks & Co and Jonathan Brooks. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Jonathan Brooks & Co and Jonathan Brooks or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://podcastplayer.com/legal.
Player FM - Podcast App
Go offline with the Player FM app!

Has Rome "Won" the Sola Scriptura Debate? A Response to Cameron Rieker | Weighed in the Balance Ep. 6

34:20
 
Share
 

Manage episode 485336615 series 3662239
Content provided by Jonathan Brooks & Co and Jonathan Brooks. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Jonathan Brooks & Co and Jonathan Brooks or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://podcastplayer.com/legal.

Send us a text

In this episode, we respond to a recent video by Cameron Rieker (watch it here) in which he argues that Roman Catholics can "win" the Sola Scriptura debate by demonstrating Catholic doctrine from Scripture via "good and necessary consequence." Cameron claims that if Protestants reject these arguments, it proves Scripture's insufficiency.

We take a closer look at what “good and necessary consequence” actually means and how it's been historically understood. We examine what the Westminster Confession of Faith really teaches on this subject, and whether Cameron accurately represents the Protestant position.

Ultimately, we find that Cameron’s critique fails to grasp the doctrine he's attempting to refute—and that far from winning the debate, he misunderstands its terms entirely.

Support the show

Do you think this claim is found wanting? Let us know on social!!

Click here to find us everywhere!!

  continue reading

7 episodes

Artwork
iconShare
 
Manage episode 485336615 series 3662239
Content provided by Jonathan Brooks & Co and Jonathan Brooks. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Jonathan Brooks & Co and Jonathan Brooks or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://podcastplayer.com/legal.

Send us a text

In this episode, we respond to a recent video by Cameron Rieker (watch it here) in which he argues that Roman Catholics can "win" the Sola Scriptura debate by demonstrating Catholic doctrine from Scripture via "good and necessary consequence." Cameron claims that if Protestants reject these arguments, it proves Scripture's insufficiency.

We take a closer look at what “good and necessary consequence” actually means and how it's been historically understood. We examine what the Westminster Confession of Faith really teaches on this subject, and whether Cameron accurately represents the Protestant position.

Ultimately, we find that Cameron’s critique fails to grasp the doctrine he's attempting to refute—and that far from winning the debate, he misunderstands its terms entirely.

Support the show

Do you think this claim is found wanting? Let us know on social!!

Click here to find us everywhere!!

  continue reading

7 episodes

All episodes

×
 
Loading …

Welcome to Player FM!

Player FM is scanning the web for high-quality podcasts for you to enjoy right now. It's the best podcast app and works on Android, iPhone, and the web. Signup to sync subscriptions across devices.

 

Copyright 2025 | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | | Copyright
Listen to this show while you explore
Play