Search a title or topic

Over 20 million podcasts, powered by 

Player FM logo
Artwork

Content provided by Steve Jones. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Steve Jones or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.
Player FM - Podcast App
Go offline with the Player FM app!

Poor Name Choice

3:07
 
Share
 

Manage episode 518060050 series 45278
Content provided by Steve Jones. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Steve Jones or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://podcastplayer.com/legal.

I wrote recently about some work with Redgate Clone, and one of the things I did was start up a blank container instance of SQL Server from the image named empty-sql-current. This image contains SQL Server 2019. Clearly, "current" was a poor choice.

I see this often in various places, where someone will reference "current", "new", "latest", or some other term that denotes the most recent changes. If everyone reading the reference is doing so with knowledge of the past and at a time close to publication, this works fine. However, a year later, does this make sense? At the same time, I do like consistent names that might be used in scripts. If I always want developers pulling the latest item, I might use latest. However, if versions are important, than "latest" or "current" might not be the best choice. Much of the time, I tend to try and get a version or some other specific indicator in a name.

Read the rest of Poor Name Choice

  continue reading

325 episodes

Artwork

Poor Name Choice

Voice of the DBA

37 subscribers

published

iconShare
 
Manage episode 518060050 series 45278
Content provided by Steve Jones. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Steve Jones or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://podcastplayer.com/legal.

I wrote recently about some work with Redgate Clone, and one of the things I did was start up a blank container instance of SQL Server from the image named empty-sql-current. This image contains SQL Server 2019. Clearly, "current" was a poor choice.

I see this often in various places, where someone will reference "current", "new", "latest", or some other term that denotes the most recent changes. If everyone reading the reference is doing so with knowledge of the past and at a time close to publication, this works fine. However, a year later, does this make sense? At the same time, I do like consistent names that might be used in scripts. If I always want developers pulling the latest item, I might use latest. However, if versions are important, than "latest" or "current" might not be the best choice. Much of the time, I tend to try and get a version or some other specific indicator in a name.

Read the rest of Poor Name Choice

  continue reading

325 episodes

All episodes

×
 
Loading …

Welcome to Player FM!

Player FM is scanning the web for high-quality podcasts for you to enjoy right now. It's the best podcast app and works on Android, iPhone, and the web. Signup to sync subscriptions across devices.

 

Copyright 2025 | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | | Copyright
Listen to this show while you explore
Play