Search a title or topic

Over 20 million podcasts, powered by 

Player FM logo
Artwork

Content provided by David Provan. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by David Provan or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.
Player FM - Podcast App
Go offline with the Player FM app!

Ep. 113 When are seemingly impossible goals good for performance?

58:25
 
Share
 

Manage episode 388792898 series 2571262
Content provided by David Provan. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by David Provan or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://podcastplayer.com/legal.

The conversation stems from a review of a noteworthy paper from the Academy of Management Review Journal titled "The Paradox of Stretch Goals: Organizations in Pursuit of the Seemingly Impossible," which offers invaluable insights into the world of goal setting in senior management.

Discussion Points:

  • The concept of seemingly impossible goals in organizations
  • Controversial nature and impact of ‘zero harm’
  • The role of stretch goals in promoting innovation
  • Potential negative effects of setting stretch goals
  • Psychological effects of ambitious organizational targets
  • Paradoxical outcomes of setting seemingly impossible goals
  • The role of emotions in achieving stretch goals
  • Factors that contribute to the success of stretch goals
  • Real-world examples of successful stretch goal implementation
  • Cautions against blind imitation of successful stretch goal strategies
  • The concept of zero harm in safety initiatives
  • Need for long-term research on zero harm effectiveness
  • The answer to our episode’s question – they're good when the organization is currently doing well enough, but stretch goals are not good when the organization is struggling and trying to turn a corner using that stretch goal.

Quotes:

"The basic idea [of ‘zero harm’] is that companies should adopt a visionary goal of having zero accidents. Often that comes along with commitment statements by managers, sometimes by workers as well that everyone is committed to the vision of having no accidents." - Drew

“I think organizations are in this loop, where I know maybe I can't achieve zero, but I can't say anything other than zero because that wouldn't be moral or responsible, because I'd be saying it's okay to hurt people. So I set zero because it's the best thing for me to do.” - David

“The “stretch goal” was credited with the introduction of hybrid cars. You've got to have a whole new way of managing your car to get that seemingly impossible goal of doubling your efficiency.”- Drew

Resources:

Link to the Paper

The Safety of Work Podcast

The Safety of Work on LinkedIn

Feedback@safetyofwork

  continue reading

133 episodes

Artwork
iconShare
 
Manage episode 388792898 series 2571262
Content provided by David Provan. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by David Provan or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://podcastplayer.com/legal.

The conversation stems from a review of a noteworthy paper from the Academy of Management Review Journal titled "The Paradox of Stretch Goals: Organizations in Pursuit of the Seemingly Impossible," which offers invaluable insights into the world of goal setting in senior management.

Discussion Points:

  • The concept of seemingly impossible goals in organizations
  • Controversial nature and impact of ‘zero harm’
  • The role of stretch goals in promoting innovation
  • Potential negative effects of setting stretch goals
  • Psychological effects of ambitious organizational targets
  • Paradoxical outcomes of setting seemingly impossible goals
  • The role of emotions in achieving stretch goals
  • Factors that contribute to the success of stretch goals
  • Real-world examples of successful stretch goal implementation
  • Cautions against blind imitation of successful stretch goal strategies
  • The concept of zero harm in safety initiatives
  • Need for long-term research on zero harm effectiveness
  • The answer to our episode’s question – they're good when the organization is currently doing well enough, but stretch goals are not good when the organization is struggling and trying to turn a corner using that stretch goal.

Quotes:

"The basic idea [of ‘zero harm’] is that companies should adopt a visionary goal of having zero accidents. Often that comes along with commitment statements by managers, sometimes by workers as well that everyone is committed to the vision of having no accidents." - Drew

“I think organizations are in this loop, where I know maybe I can't achieve zero, but I can't say anything other than zero because that wouldn't be moral or responsible, because I'd be saying it's okay to hurt people. So I set zero because it's the best thing for me to do.” - David

“The “stretch goal” was credited with the introduction of hybrid cars. You've got to have a whole new way of managing your car to get that seemingly impossible goal of doubling your efficiency.”- Drew

Resources:

Link to the Paper

The Safety of Work Podcast

The Safety of Work on LinkedIn

Feedback@safetyofwork

  continue reading

133 episodes

All episodes

×
 
Loading …

Welcome to Player FM!

Player FM is scanning the web for high-quality podcasts for you to enjoy right now. It's the best podcast app and works on Android, iPhone, and the web. Signup to sync subscriptions across devices.

 

Copyright 2025 | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | | Copyright
Listen to this show while you explore
Play