Search a title or topic

Over 20 million podcasts, powered by 

Player FM logo
Artwork

Content provided by www.mollymcpherson.com. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by www.mollymcpherson.com or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://podcastplayer.com/legal.
Player FM - Podcast App
Go offline with the Player FM app!

How Harvard Said No—and Made It Stick

23:28
 
Share
 

Manage episode 478535014 series 2861141
Content provided by www.mollymcpherson.com. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by www.mollymcpherson.com or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://podcastplayer.com/legal.

This episode examines Harvard University’s April 2025 letter rejecting sweeping demands from the Trump administration—an act of resistance that was principled, measured, and strategically precise.

The statement didn’t chase headlines or play defense. It outlined the stakes, drew a legal and ethical line, and delivered a message that stood on mission—not fear.

Listeners will hear a breakdown of how the letter was structured, why it worked, and what it signals for anyone responsible for high-stakes communication. The episode explores how transparency, when guided by values, creates reputational resilience—even under political and public pressure. Essential listening for leaders, communicators, and institutions preparing to face conflict—and determined to do it without flinching.

Key Themes:

  • Framing a public statement when the pressure is high
  • Avoiding vague language and moral compromise in moments of risk
  • Why clarity and conviction are more protective than silence
  • Lessons in structure, tone, and timing from Harvard’s strategy

Mentioned in this Episode:

Want More Behind the Breakdown?
Follow The PR Breakdown with Molly McPherson on Substack for early access to podcast episodes, exclusive member chats, weekly lives, and monthly workshops that go deeper than the mic. It's the insider’s hub for communicators who want strategy with spine—and a little side-eye where it counts.
Follow Molly → @MollyMcPherson
Subscribe to PR Breakdown on Substack → prbreakdown.media
Need a Keynote Speaker? Drawing from real-world PR battles, Molly delivers the same engaging stories and hard-won crisis insights from the podcast to your live audience. Click here to book Molly for your next meeting.

Follow & Connect with Molly:

© 2025 The PR Breakdown with Molly McPherson

  continue reading

Chapters

1. Harvard's Revolutionary Letter (00:00:00)

2. Boston Timeline and Context (00:01:42)

3. The Friday Night Threat (00:05:30)

4. Anatomy of Harvard's Bold Response (00:09:16)

5. Courage in Leadership (00:14:00)

6. Framework for High-Stakes Statements (00:19:16)

7. Resources and Closing Thoughts (00:21:58)

321 episodes

Artwork
iconShare
 
Manage episode 478535014 series 2861141
Content provided by www.mollymcpherson.com. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by www.mollymcpherson.com or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://podcastplayer.com/legal.

This episode examines Harvard University’s April 2025 letter rejecting sweeping demands from the Trump administration—an act of resistance that was principled, measured, and strategically precise.

The statement didn’t chase headlines or play defense. It outlined the stakes, drew a legal and ethical line, and delivered a message that stood on mission—not fear.

Listeners will hear a breakdown of how the letter was structured, why it worked, and what it signals for anyone responsible for high-stakes communication. The episode explores how transparency, when guided by values, creates reputational resilience—even under political and public pressure. Essential listening for leaders, communicators, and institutions preparing to face conflict—and determined to do it without flinching.

Key Themes:

  • Framing a public statement when the pressure is high
  • Avoiding vague language and moral compromise in moments of risk
  • Why clarity and conviction are more protective than silence
  • Lessons in structure, tone, and timing from Harvard’s strategy

Mentioned in this Episode:

Want More Behind the Breakdown?
Follow The PR Breakdown with Molly McPherson on Substack for early access to podcast episodes, exclusive member chats, weekly lives, and monthly workshops that go deeper than the mic. It's the insider’s hub for communicators who want strategy with spine—and a little side-eye where it counts.
Follow Molly → @MollyMcPherson
Subscribe to PR Breakdown on Substack → prbreakdown.media
Need a Keynote Speaker? Drawing from real-world PR battles, Molly delivers the same engaging stories and hard-won crisis insights from the podcast to your live audience. Click here to book Molly for your next meeting.

Follow & Connect with Molly:

© 2025 The PR Breakdown with Molly McPherson

  continue reading

Chapters

1. Harvard's Revolutionary Letter (00:00:00)

2. Boston Timeline and Context (00:01:42)

3. The Friday Night Threat (00:05:30)

4. Anatomy of Harvard's Bold Response (00:09:16)

5. Courage in Leadership (00:14:00)

6. Framework for High-Stakes Statements (00:19:16)

7. Resources and Closing Thoughts (00:21:58)

321 episodes

Tất cả các tập

×
 
Loading …

Welcome to Player FM!

Player FM is scanning the web for high-quality podcasts for you to enjoy right now. It's the best podcast app and works on Android, iPhone, and the web. Signup to sync subscriptions across devices.

 

Listen to this show while you explore
Play