Search a title or topic

Over 20 million podcasts, powered by 

Player FM logo
Artwork

Content provided by WNYC Studios and The New Yorker, WNYC Studios, and The New Yorker. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by WNYC Studios and The New Yorker, WNYC Studios, and The New Yorker or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://podcastplayer.com/legal.
Player FM - Podcast App
Go offline with the Player FM app!

How the “Dangerous Gimmick” of the Two-State Solution Ended in Disaster

38:27
 
Share
 

Manage episode 505892083 series 94072
Content provided by WNYC Studios and The New Yorker, WNYC Studios, and The New Yorker. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by WNYC Studios and The New Yorker, WNYC Studios, and The New Yorker or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://podcastplayer.com/legal.

For decades, the United States backed efforts to achieve a two-state solution—in which Israel would exist side by side with the Palestinian state, with both states recognizing each other’s claim to contested territory. The veteran negotiators Hussein Agha, representing Palestine, and Robert Malley, an American diplomat, played instrumental roles in that long effort, including the critical Camp David summit of 2000. But, in their new book, “Tomorrow Is Yesterday,” they conclude that they were part of a charade. There was never any way that a two-state solution could satisfy either of the parties, Agha and Malley tell David Remnick in an interview. “A waste of time is almost a charitable way to look at it,” Malley notes bitterly. “At the end of that thirty-year-or-so period, the Israelis and Palestinians are in a worse situation than before the U.S. got so heavily invested.” The process, appealing to Western leaders and liberals in Israel, was geared to “find the kind of solutions that have a technical outcome, that are measurable, and that can be portrayed by lines on maps,” Agha says. “It completely discarded the issue of emotions and history. You can’t be emotional. You have to be rational. You have to be cool. But rational and cool has nothing to do with the conflict.”

What Killed the Two-State Solution?,” an excerpt from Agha and Malley’s new book, was published in The New Yorker.

  continue reading

973 episodes

Artwork
iconShare
 
Manage episode 505892083 series 94072
Content provided by WNYC Studios and The New Yorker, WNYC Studios, and The New Yorker. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by WNYC Studios and The New Yorker, WNYC Studios, and The New Yorker or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://podcastplayer.com/legal.

For decades, the United States backed efforts to achieve a two-state solution—in which Israel would exist side by side with the Palestinian state, with both states recognizing each other’s claim to contested territory. The veteran negotiators Hussein Agha, representing Palestine, and Robert Malley, an American diplomat, played instrumental roles in that long effort, including the critical Camp David summit of 2000. But, in their new book, “Tomorrow Is Yesterday,” they conclude that they were part of a charade. There was never any way that a two-state solution could satisfy either of the parties, Agha and Malley tell David Remnick in an interview. “A waste of time is almost a charitable way to look at it,” Malley notes bitterly. “At the end of that thirty-year-or-so period, the Israelis and Palestinians are in a worse situation than before the U.S. got so heavily invested.” The process, appealing to Western leaders and liberals in Israel, was geared to “find the kind of solutions that have a technical outcome, that are measurable, and that can be portrayed by lines on maps,” Agha says. “It completely discarded the issue of emotions and history. You can’t be emotional. You have to be rational. You have to be cool. But rational and cool has nothing to do with the conflict.”

What Killed the Two-State Solution?,” an excerpt from Agha and Malley’s new book, was published in The New Yorker.

  continue reading

973 episodes

Tất cả các tập

×
 
Loading …

Welcome to Player FM!

Player FM is scanning the web for high-quality podcasts for you to enjoy right now. It's the best podcast app and works on Android, iPhone, and the web. Signup to sync subscriptions across devices.

 

Copyright 2025 | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | | Copyright
Listen to this show while you explore
Play