))
A Supreme Court case could redefine contractor liability in combat zones
Manage episode 515907190 series 2701908
Content provided by Federal News Network | Hubbard Radio. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Federal News Network | Hubbard Radio or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://podcastplayer.com/legal.
The Supreme Court will hear Hencely v. Fluor on November 3, revisiting a decades-old precedent that shields contractors from state-law claims tied to military operations. Here to explain how the combatant activities exception works, and why this case could reshape risk and accountability for contractors in conflict zones is Lisa Himes of counsel with Rogers Joseph O’Donnell.
See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
503 episodes
Share
