The UK Column is an independent news organisation analysing the information war. Operating without financial backing or external investment, we remain free from advertisers, foundations, and political parties, relying solely on support from our audience through memberships and donations.
…
continue reading
Content provided by Bobby Capucci. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Bobby Capucci or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.
Player FM - Podcast App
Go offline with the Player FM app!
Go offline with the Player FM app!
Ghislaine Maxwell Responds To Virginia Roberts Request To Exceed The 10 Deposition Limit (8/23/25)
MP3•Episode home
Manage episode 501942833 series 3380507
Content provided by Bobby Capucci. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Bobby Capucci or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://podcastplayer.com/legal.
Ghislaine Maxwell’s legal team opposed Virginia Roberts Giuffre’s request to exceed the ten-deposition limit, arguing that the motion was overreaching and unnecessary. Maxwell’s attorneys maintained that the rules of civil procedure set the limit for good reason, and that Giuffre’s attempt to expand the scope was a tactic designed to harass Maxwell and drag out the proceedings. They contended that the case, at its core, was a straightforward defamation dispute—not a sprawling criminal investigation—and therefore did not warrant an exception to the established limits.
Maxwell’s response emphasized efficiency and proportionality, claiming that Giuffre already had ample opportunity to gather evidence within the allowed parameters. Her lawyers argued that permitting more depositions would unfairly burden Maxwell, increase costs, and create an undue spectacle around the case. They framed Giuffre’s request as an attempt to broaden discovery into areas irrelevant to the specific defamation claim, painting it as a fishing expedition aimed more at media headlines than legal necessity.
to contact me:
[email protected]
source:
Jeffrey Epstein list: See all 40 unsealed documents | Fox News
Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
…
continue reading
Maxwell’s response emphasized efficiency and proportionality, claiming that Giuffre already had ample opportunity to gather evidence within the allowed parameters. Her lawyers argued that permitting more depositions would unfairly burden Maxwell, increase costs, and create an undue spectacle around the case. They framed Giuffre’s request as an attempt to broaden discovery into areas irrelevant to the specific defamation claim, painting it as a fishing expedition aimed more at media headlines than legal necessity.
to contact me:
[email protected]
source:
Jeffrey Epstein list: See all 40 unsealed documents | Fox News
Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
1042 episodes
MP3•Episode home
Manage episode 501942833 series 3380507
Content provided by Bobby Capucci. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Bobby Capucci or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://podcastplayer.com/legal.
Ghislaine Maxwell’s legal team opposed Virginia Roberts Giuffre’s request to exceed the ten-deposition limit, arguing that the motion was overreaching and unnecessary. Maxwell’s attorneys maintained that the rules of civil procedure set the limit for good reason, and that Giuffre’s attempt to expand the scope was a tactic designed to harass Maxwell and drag out the proceedings. They contended that the case, at its core, was a straightforward defamation dispute—not a sprawling criminal investigation—and therefore did not warrant an exception to the established limits.
Maxwell’s response emphasized efficiency and proportionality, claiming that Giuffre already had ample opportunity to gather evidence within the allowed parameters. Her lawyers argued that permitting more depositions would unfairly burden Maxwell, increase costs, and create an undue spectacle around the case. They framed Giuffre’s request as an attempt to broaden discovery into areas irrelevant to the specific defamation claim, painting it as a fishing expedition aimed more at media headlines than legal necessity.
to contact me:
[email protected]
source:
Jeffrey Epstein list: See all 40 unsealed documents | Fox News
Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
…
continue reading
Maxwell’s response emphasized efficiency and proportionality, claiming that Giuffre already had ample opportunity to gather evidence within the allowed parameters. Her lawyers argued that permitting more depositions would unfairly burden Maxwell, increase costs, and create an undue spectacle around the case. They framed Giuffre’s request as an attempt to broaden discovery into areas irrelevant to the specific defamation claim, painting it as a fishing expedition aimed more at media headlines than legal necessity.
to contact me:
[email protected]
source:
Jeffrey Epstein list: See all 40 unsealed documents | Fox News
Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
1042 episodes
All episodes
×Welcome to Player FM!
Player FM is scanning the web for high-quality podcasts for you to enjoy right now. It's the best podcast app and works on Android, iPhone, and the web. Signup to sync subscriptions across devices.