AI Evidence in WorkSafeBC Appeals: How Review Officers Weigh ChatGPT and Other AI-Generated Material

The BC Safety Briefing

Over 20 million podcasts, powered by

Content provided by David Dunham. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by David Dunham or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://podcastplayer.com/legal.

3M ago 7:46

MP3•Episode home

Archived series ("Inactive feed" status)

When? This feed was archived on December 10, 2025 13:18 (19h ago). Last successful fetch was on September 16, 2025 12:08 (3M ago)

Why? Inactive feed status. Our servers were unable to retrieve a valid podcast feed for a sustained period.

What now? You might be able to find a more up-to-date version using the search function. This series will no longer be checked for updates. If you believe this to be in error, please check if the publisher's feed link below is valid and contact support to request the feed be restored or if you have any other concerns about this.

In this episode of The BC Safety Briefing, we examine how AI tools like ChatGPT are being used in workers' compensation appeals and how review officers actually weigh this evidence. Through analysis of recent Review Division decisions, we explore why AI-generated wage data and medical research carry little weight without proper source attribution. Learn practical strategies for using AI effectively as a research assistant while ensuring your evidence meets BC review standards.

11 episodes