Search a title or topic

Over 20 million podcasts, powered by 

Player FM logo
Artwork

Content provided by Conscience by Design 2025. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Conscience by Design 2025 or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.
Player FM - Podcast App
Go offline with the Player FM app!

Deep Dive Why AI Needs an Inner Constitutional Structure

30:55
 
Share
 

Manage episode 524528768 series 3705057
Content provided by Conscience by Design 2025. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Conscience by Design 2025 or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://podcastplayer.com/legal.

Send us a text

Power fails when it runs faster than responsibility and our AI systems are already sprinting. We dig into a bold idea: borrow the constitutional logic that kept human institutions resilient and embed it directly into code. Instead of hoping for ethical outcomes after the fact, we engineer internal restraint that operates at machine speed, before actions land on people’s lives.
We trace the quiet drift from “optimize for efficiency” to normalized harm: small compromises accumulate, audits lag, and metrics replace morals. Then we map a separation‑of‑powers model onto AI: the optimizer proposes; an independent validator our internal “court” tests the action against non‑negotiable principles; only then does an execution layer act. The validator’s charter centers legitimacy, not engagement or profit, and every decision pathway is immutably logged for notice and a hearing. This is due process for algorithms, built to resist capture and preserve accountability when millions of decisions happen in milliseconds.
We get specific on design: structural separation of intent, validation, and execution; cryptographically verifiable logs; emergency veto at machine speed; and structural neutrality so the checker cannot be influenced by the checked. We lay out the hard boundaries protect life, respect human dignity, avoid irreversible or coercive harm and explain why capability metrics like accuracy and latency can never grant legitimacy on their own. Finally, we tackle micro‑drift: real‑time telemetry on boundary‑violation attempts and override rates that trigger timely external reviews.
If you care about trustworthy AI, this is a blueprint for turning ethics from a policy slide into a living architecture. Subscribe, share with a colleague who builds or governs AI, and leave a review telling us which non‑negotiable boundary you would hard‑code first.

Thank you for listening.

To explore the vision behind Conscience by Design 2025 and the creation of Machine Conscience, visit our official pages and join the movement that brings ethics, clarity and responsibility into the heart of intelligent systems.

Follow for updates, new releases and deeper insights into the future of AI shaped with conscience.

Conscience by Design Initiative 2025

  continue reading

Chapters

1. Framing The Core Question (00:00:00)

2. History’s Lesson On Power And Drift (00:02:45)

3. The U.S. Constitutional Blueprint (00:06:40)

4. AI As Real-World Authority (00:09:15)

5. Optimization’s Quiet Path To Harm (00:12:30)

6. Capability Versus Legitimacy (00:16:10)

7. External Oversight’s Speed Gap (00:19:20)

8. Separating Intent, Validation, Execution (00:22:20)

9. Designing An Internal “Court” (00:26:00)

10. Due Process In Algorithms (00:29:00)

4 episodes

Artwork
iconShare
 
Manage episode 524528768 series 3705057
Content provided by Conscience by Design 2025. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Conscience by Design 2025 or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://podcastplayer.com/legal.

Send us a text

Power fails when it runs faster than responsibility and our AI systems are already sprinting. We dig into a bold idea: borrow the constitutional logic that kept human institutions resilient and embed it directly into code. Instead of hoping for ethical outcomes after the fact, we engineer internal restraint that operates at machine speed, before actions land on people’s lives.
We trace the quiet drift from “optimize for efficiency” to normalized harm: small compromises accumulate, audits lag, and metrics replace morals. Then we map a separation‑of‑powers model onto AI: the optimizer proposes; an independent validator our internal “court” tests the action against non‑negotiable principles; only then does an execution layer act. The validator’s charter centers legitimacy, not engagement or profit, and every decision pathway is immutably logged for notice and a hearing. This is due process for algorithms, built to resist capture and preserve accountability when millions of decisions happen in milliseconds.
We get specific on design: structural separation of intent, validation, and execution; cryptographically verifiable logs; emergency veto at machine speed; and structural neutrality so the checker cannot be influenced by the checked. We lay out the hard boundaries protect life, respect human dignity, avoid irreversible or coercive harm and explain why capability metrics like accuracy and latency can never grant legitimacy on their own. Finally, we tackle micro‑drift: real‑time telemetry on boundary‑violation attempts and override rates that trigger timely external reviews.
If you care about trustworthy AI, this is a blueprint for turning ethics from a policy slide into a living architecture. Subscribe, share with a colleague who builds or governs AI, and leave a review telling us which non‑negotiable boundary you would hard‑code first.

Thank you for listening.

To explore the vision behind Conscience by Design 2025 and the creation of Machine Conscience, visit our official pages and join the movement that brings ethics, clarity and responsibility into the heart of intelligent systems.

Follow for updates, new releases and deeper insights into the future of AI shaped with conscience.

Conscience by Design Initiative 2025

  continue reading

Chapters

1. Framing The Core Question (00:00:00)

2. History’s Lesson On Power And Drift (00:02:45)

3. The U.S. Constitutional Blueprint (00:06:40)

4. AI As Real-World Authority (00:09:15)

5. Optimization’s Quiet Path To Harm (00:12:30)

6. Capability Versus Legitimacy (00:16:10)

7. External Oversight’s Speed Gap (00:19:20)

8. Separating Intent, Validation, Execution (00:22:20)

9. Designing An Internal “Court” (00:26:00)

10. Due Process In Algorithms (00:29:00)

4 episodes

All episodes

×
 
Loading …

Welcome to Player FM!

Player FM is scanning the web for high-quality podcasts for you to enjoy right now. It's the best podcast app and works on Android, iPhone, and the web. Signup to sync subscriptions across devices.

 

Copyright 2025 | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | | Copyright
Listen to this show while you explore
Play