Search a title or topic

Over 20 million podcasts, powered by 

Player FM logo
Artwork

Content provided by Ran Chen. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Ran Chen or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://podcastplayer.com/legal.
Player FM - Podcast App
Go offline with the Player FM app!

Cracking the Code to Saudi Arabia's MedTech Market: A Pure Global Deep Dive into SFDA MDS-G5 Technical Documentation Requirements

3:17
 
Share
 

Manage episode 507419584 series 3684624
Content provided by Ran Chen. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Ran Chen or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://podcastplayer.com/legal.
This episode of MENA MedTech Insights offers a deep dive into the technical documentation required by the Saudi Food and Drug Authority's (SFDA) MDS-G5 guidance. We break down the critical components of a successful technical file submission, from device descriptions and risk management to clinical evaluation reports, for MedTech and IVD companies targeting the Saudi Arabian market. We explore the common pitfalls that can lead to significant delays and rejections. For instance, a promising MedTech startup with an innovative diagnostic tool faced a six-month setback and costly revisions. Their mistake? They submitted a generic technical file that passed in Europe but failed to address SFDA's specific requirements for local labeling in Arabic and lacked a comprehensive risk analysis for the local patient population, halting their market entry and straining investor relations. Key Takeaways: - What are the five essential pillars of the SFDA MDS-G5 technical file? - Why is the ISO 14971 risk management file a common point of failure for SFDA submissions? - Does your Clinical Evaluation Report (CER) meet Saudi-specific requirements? - How can improper labeling and Instructions For Use (IFU) derail your entire application? - What role does existing approval from GHTF-founding members play in the SFDA review process? - Are you prepared for the Arabic language requirements for your submission? - How do you demonstrate conformity to the Essential Principles of Safety and Performance effectively? At Pure Global, we specialize in transforming these complex regulatory challenges into clear market access strategies. Our team combines local Saudi expertise with advanced AI tools to ensure your technical documentation is flawless and fully compliant with SFDA standards, accelerating your time-to-market. Contact us for end-to-end regulatory consulting at [email protected] or visit https://pureglobal.com/.
  continue reading

38 episodes

Artwork
iconShare
 
Manage episode 507419584 series 3684624
Content provided by Ran Chen. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Ran Chen or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://podcastplayer.com/legal.
This episode of MENA MedTech Insights offers a deep dive into the technical documentation required by the Saudi Food and Drug Authority's (SFDA) MDS-G5 guidance. We break down the critical components of a successful technical file submission, from device descriptions and risk management to clinical evaluation reports, for MedTech and IVD companies targeting the Saudi Arabian market. We explore the common pitfalls that can lead to significant delays and rejections. For instance, a promising MedTech startup with an innovative diagnostic tool faced a six-month setback and costly revisions. Their mistake? They submitted a generic technical file that passed in Europe but failed to address SFDA's specific requirements for local labeling in Arabic and lacked a comprehensive risk analysis for the local patient population, halting their market entry and straining investor relations. Key Takeaways: - What are the five essential pillars of the SFDA MDS-G5 technical file? - Why is the ISO 14971 risk management file a common point of failure for SFDA submissions? - Does your Clinical Evaluation Report (CER) meet Saudi-specific requirements? - How can improper labeling and Instructions For Use (IFU) derail your entire application? - What role does existing approval from GHTF-founding members play in the SFDA review process? - Are you prepared for the Arabic language requirements for your submission? - How do you demonstrate conformity to the Essential Principles of Safety and Performance effectively? At Pure Global, we specialize in transforming these complex regulatory challenges into clear market access strategies. Our team combines local Saudi expertise with advanced AI tools to ensure your technical documentation is flawless and fully compliant with SFDA standards, accelerating your time-to-market. Contact us for end-to-end regulatory consulting at [email protected] or visit https://pureglobal.com/.
  continue reading

38 episodes

Tüm bölümler

×
 
Loading …

Welcome to Player FM!

Player FM is scanning the web for high-quality podcasts for you to enjoy right now. It's the best podcast app and works on Android, iPhone, and the web. Signup to sync subscriptions across devices.

 

Copyright 2025 | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | | Copyright
Listen to this show while you explore
Play