This episode of MedTech Global Insights demystifies the critical IEC 62366-1 standard for usability engineering. We move beyond theory to explore how a structured, safety-focused design process is essential for preventing use-related errors that can lead to patient harm. Learn about the key stages of the usability engineering process, from initial specifications to final validation, and understand why it is a non-negotiable requirement for securing market approval from global regulatory bodies like the FDA and in the EU. We examine a real-world scenario to highlight the stakes. Imagine a nurse in a hectic ICU attempting to program an infusion pump for a critical medication. A poorly designed user interface causes them to mistake 10.0 mg/hr for 100 mg/hr, resulting in a severe overdose. This episode breaks down how the rigorous process outlined in IEC 62366-1 is specifically designed to identify, mitigate, and test against such catastrophic use errors before a device ever reaches the hospital floor. Key Takeaways: - Why is "usability" in MedTech a critical safety feature and not just a matter of user preference? - What is the difference between a "use error" and a "user mistake," and why does it matter for your regulatory submission? - How can you identify potentially hazardous use scenarios before you even have a physical prototype? - What are the crucial differences between formative and summative usability evaluations? - How does the Usability Engineering File become a cornerstone of your FDA 510(k) or EU MDR technical documentation? - Can you leverage a single set of usability data to enter multiple global markets? - What common pitfalls lead to failed summative evaluations and costly project delays? - How does the user profile directly influence the risk analysis for your device? For more information, contact us at [email protected] or visit https://pureglobal.com/.