Search a title or topic

Over 20 million podcasts, powered by 

Player FM logo
Artwork

Content provided by Hemmat Interactive, Inc. and Hemmat Interactive. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Hemmat Interactive, Inc. and Hemmat Interactive or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://podcastplayer.com/legal.
Player FM - Podcast App
Go offline with the Player FM app!

S1E21 Inside Lochner v. New York: Work, Rights, and the Constitution [VIDEO]

53:50
 
Share
 

Manage episode 492567667 series 3623319
Content provided by Hemmat Interactive, Inc. and Hemmat Interactive. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Hemmat Interactive, Inc. and Hemmat Interactive or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://podcastplayer.com/legal.

The case of Lochner v. New York is widely considered a landmark in Supreme Court history, one which kicked off an era of aggressive adherence to business interest protections and wealth accumulation during the Gilded Age of the robberbaron. This case kicked off the so-called Lochner or Lochnerian Era, which lasted about 30 years until the political atmosphere of the Great Depression prompted the court to reverse its stance on labor protections in West Coast Hotel v. Parrish, a detour that SCOTUS has stuck with in all proceeding rulings to this day — but the truth of the modern labor law landscape is not as black and white.

Support our work, find our links, and join our community!

Sources:

Lochner v. New York

West Coast Hotel v. Parrish

The Jungle

Bakeshop Act of 1895

Tenement buildings

Britannica

with many working over 100 hours a week

Labor activists stumped

Opponents of laws like the Bakehouse Act

almost $1,900

Lochner’s team

argued

Due process was, historically

substantive due process

Substantive due process

made only three brief points

SCOTUS sided with Lochner

recognized this freedom

Holden v. Hardy

a rallying cry for the Progressive movement

professor of law at the University of Chicago

describes this period

Adkins v. Children’s Hospital of D.C.

ruled in favor of the hospital

also argued

Muller v. Oregon

Columbia Undergraduate Law Review

West Coast Hotel Company v. Parrish

a plan to expand and pack the court

hotel maid in Washington

the court ruled

Oyez

economic due process, that business owners were protected by the Fourteenth Amendment

Equal Protection Rights under the Fourteenth Amendment

Hariharan in the Columbia Undergraduate Law Review

disregard the imbalance of bargaining power

laid out in the Economic Policy Institute

as detailed here by the Illinois Law Review

Epic Systems v. Lewis

Wal-Mart Stores Inc v. Dukes

Gross v. FBL Financial Services, Inc.

Vance v. Ball State University

Janus v. American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31

GWP is a Hemmat Interactive, Inc. production.

  continue reading

50 episodes

Artwork
iconShare
 
Manage episode 492567667 series 3623319
Content provided by Hemmat Interactive, Inc. and Hemmat Interactive. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Hemmat Interactive, Inc. and Hemmat Interactive or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://podcastplayer.com/legal.

The case of Lochner v. New York is widely considered a landmark in Supreme Court history, one which kicked off an era of aggressive adherence to business interest protections and wealth accumulation during the Gilded Age of the robberbaron. This case kicked off the so-called Lochner or Lochnerian Era, which lasted about 30 years until the political atmosphere of the Great Depression prompted the court to reverse its stance on labor protections in West Coast Hotel v. Parrish, a detour that SCOTUS has stuck with in all proceeding rulings to this day — but the truth of the modern labor law landscape is not as black and white.

Support our work, find our links, and join our community!

Sources:

Lochner v. New York

West Coast Hotel v. Parrish

The Jungle

Bakeshop Act of 1895

Tenement buildings

Britannica

with many working over 100 hours a week

Labor activists stumped

Opponents of laws like the Bakehouse Act

almost $1,900

Lochner’s team

argued

Due process was, historically

substantive due process

Substantive due process

made only three brief points

SCOTUS sided with Lochner

recognized this freedom

Holden v. Hardy

a rallying cry for the Progressive movement

professor of law at the University of Chicago

describes this period

Adkins v. Children’s Hospital of D.C.

ruled in favor of the hospital

also argued

Muller v. Oregon

Columbia Undergraduate Law Review

West Coast Hotel Company v. Parrish

a plan to expand and pack the court

hotel maid in Washington

the court ruled

Oyez

economic due process, that business owners were protected by the Fourteenth Amendment

Equal Protection Rights under the Fourteenth Amendment

Hariharan in the Columbia Undergraduate Law Review

disregard the imbalance of bargaining power

laid out in the Economic Policy Institute

as detailed here by the Illinois Law Review

Epic Systems v. Lewis

Wal-Mart Stores Inc v. Dukes

Gross v. FBL Financial Services, Inc.

Vance v. Ball State University

Janus v. American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31

GWP is a Hemmat Interactive, Inc. production.

  continue reading

50 episodes

All episodes

×
 
Loading …

Welcome to Player FM!

Player FM is scanning the web for high-quality podcasts for you to enjoy right now. It's the best podcast app and works on Android, iPhone, and the web. Signup to sync subscriptions across devices.

 

Copyright 2025 | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | | Copyright
Listen to this show while you explore
Play