Search a title or topic

Over 20 million podcasts, powered by 

Player FM logo
Artwork

Content provided by Science Podcast and Science Magazine. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Science Podcast and Science Magazine or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.
Player FM - Podcast App
Go offline with the Player FM app!

Bats surf storm fronts, and public perception of preprints

32:34
 
Share
 

Manage episode 460246738 series 110382
Content provided by Science Podcast and Science Magazine. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Science Podcast and Science Magazine or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://podcastplayer.com/legal.

First up this week, as preprint publications ramped up during the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, so did media attention for these pre–peer-review results. But what do the readers of news reports based on preprints know about them? Associate News Editor Jeff Brainard joins host Sarah Crespi to discuss studies that look at the public perception of preprints in the news and how to inject skepticism into stories about them.

Next, placing tiny tags on bats to follow them across central Europe. Former Science intern Edward Hurme—now a postdoctoral fellow in the Department of Migration at the Max Planck Institute of Animal Behavior—revisits the podcast after 13 years. He discusses the difficulty of tracking bats as they fly long distances at night and what new tagging technology is revealing about their migration patterns.

This week’s episode was produced with help from Podigy.

About the Science Podcast

Authors: Sarah Crespi; Jeff Brainard

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

  continue reading

669 episodes

Artwork
iconShare
 
Manage episode 460246738 series 110382
Content provided by Science Podcast and Science Magazine. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Science Podcast and Science Magazine or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://podcastplayer.com/legal.

First up this week, as preprint publications ramped up during the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, so did media attention for these pre–peer-review results. But what do the readers of news reports based on preprints know about them? Associate News Editor Jeff Brainard joins host Sarah Crespi to discuss studies that look at the public perception of preprints in the news and how to inject skepticism into stories about them.

Next, placing tiny tags on bats to follow them across central Europe. Former Science intern Edward Hurme—now a postdoctoral fellow in the Department of Migration at the Max Planck Institute of Animal Behavior—revisits the podcast after 13 years. He discusses the difficulty of tracking bats as they fly long distances at night and what new tagging technology is revealing about their migration patterns.

This week’s episode was produced with help from Podigy.

About the Science Podcast

Authors: Sarah Crespi; Jeff Brainard

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

  continue reading

669 episodes

Todos los episodios

×
 
Loading …

Welcome to Player FM!

Player FM is scanning the web for high-quality podcasts for you to enjoy right now. It's the best podcast app and works on Android, iPhone, and the web. Signup to sync subscriptions across devices.

 

Copyright 2025 | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | | Copyright
Listen to this show while you explore
Play