Flash Forward is a show about possible (and not so possible) future scenarios. What would the warranty on a sex robot look like? How would diplomacy work if we couldn’t lie? Could there ever be a fecal transplant black market? (Complicated, it wouldn’t, and yes, respectively, in case you’re curious.) Hosted and produced by award winning science journalist Rose Eveleth, each episode combines audio drama and journalism to go deep on potential tomorrows, and uncovers what those futures might re ...
…
continue reading
Content provided by ReproducibiliTea Podcast. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by ReproducibiliTea Podcast or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://podcastplayer.com/legal.
Player FM - Podcast App
Go offline with the Player FM app!
Go offline with the Player FM app!
S3E3: Research Assessment Double Feature
MP3•Episode home
Manage episode 361930350 series 2386163
Content provided by ReproducibiliTea Podcast. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by ReproducibiliTea Podcast or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://podcastplayer.com/legal.
Will, Helena and Jan talk about how we assess research and that it is weird we never really learned how to do Peer Review. Papers we discussed: Responsible Research Assessment Should Prioritize Theory Development and Testing Over Ticking Open Science Boxes: https://psyarxiv.com/ad74m/ A consensus-based tool for evaluating threats to the validity of empirical Research: https://psyarxiv.com/fc8v3 Will's blog post on peer review: https://williamngiam.github.io/blog/my_peer_review_process The tool for checking p-Values: statcheck.io The tool for checking mean values: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1948550616673876 For more info go to ReproducibiliTea.org. Do you have questions? Comments? Wanna say hi? You can reach us here: https://forms.gle/H6jgUzbbpyauLxUC8
…
continue reading
73 episodes
MP3•Episode home
Manage episode 361930350 series 2386163
Content provided by ReproducibiliTea Podcast. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by ReproducibiliTea Podcast or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://podcastplayer.com/legal.
Will, Helena and Jan talk about how we assess research and that it is weird we never really learned how to do Peer Review. Papers we discussed: Responsible Research Assessment Should Prioritize Theory Development and Testing Over Ticking Open Science Boxes: https://psyarxiv.com/ad74m/ A consensus-based tool for evaluating threats to the validity of empirical Research: https://psyarxiv.com/fc8v3 Will's blog post on peer review: https://williamngiam.github.io/blog/my_peer_review_process The tool for checking p-Values: statcheck.io The tool for checking mean values: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1948550616673876 For more info go to ReproducibiliTea.org. Do you have questions? Comments? Wanna say hi? You can reach us here: https://forms.gle/H6jgUzbbpyauLxUC8
…
continue reading
73 episodes
Усі епізоди
×Welcome to Player FM!
Player FM is scanning the web for high-quality podcasts for you to enjoy right now. It's the best podcast app and works on Android, iPhone, and the web. Signup to sync subscriptions across devices.