A CEO's decision to surpass environmental regulations raises questions about fiduciary duty and profitability. The author reflects on whether exceeding these standards, while seemingly virtuous, is justifiable for a company obligated to its stakeholders. The financial implications of such actions, potentially diminishing profits, are a key concern. While personal choices may involve going above and beyond, a company's environmental actions should be carefully considered by its board, balancing compliance costs with potential benefits. Managing public relations and avoiding legal issues with the local community might also motivate a company to exceed minimum requirements. Ultimately, the author suggests a nuanced approach where environmental responsibility is weighed against financial prudence within a business context.