Send us a text

Is our digital world becoming a feudal system where tech giants rule as lords and we serve as digital serfs? This provocative question forms the backbone of today's deep dive into "techno-feudalism" – a framework that helps explain the troubling concentration of power in our increasingly AI-driven society.
The parallels are striking and sobering. Just as medieval peasants worked land they didn't own to benefit wealthy lords, we generate valuable data on platforms we don't control to enrich tech companies worth trillions. These digital fiefdoms – controlled by Meta, Amazon, Google, and others – now wield economic power that dwarfs many nations. When Elon Musk controls Starlink (internet), X/Twitter (communication), and xAI (artificial intelligence development), while appearing at government cabinet meetings in a t-shirt eating a sandwich, the lines between corporate and state power blur dangerously.
What makes this moment in history particularly concerning is how artificial intelligence amplifies these dynamics. The same handful of companies dominating our digital lives are also leading AI development, creating tools that enable unprecedented surveillance, behavioral prediction, and narrative control. Through addictive algorithms designed to maximize engagement, these platforms have literally rewired our neurological pathways, creating feedback loops that keep us tethered to their services.
Yet rays of hope exist. The democratization of AI through open-source models like DeepSeek challenges the closed corporate paradigm. Individual actions matter too – reducing social media use, supporting local communities, maintaining privacy-protecting practices, and being conscious consumers of information all help resist the tide. As we face this pivotal moment, the question remains: will we passively accept our role as digital serfs, or reclaim our digital sovereignty? The choice, while it still exists, belongs to us.