Search a title or topic

Over 20 million podcasts, powered by 

Player FM logo
Artwork

Content provided by Andrew Douglas and the Piper's Dojo Team, Andrew Douglas, and The Piper's Dojo Team. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Andrew Douglas and the Piper's Dojo Team, Andrew Douglas, and The Piper's Dojo Team or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://podcastplayer.com/legal.
Player FM - Podcast App
Go offline with the Player FM app!

471 - Is There A Better Way To Grade Band Contests? (Dojo Conversations Episode 141)

51:03
 
Share
 

Manage episode 503747953 series 1425341
Content provided by Andrew Douglas and the Piper's Dojo Team, Andrew Douglas, and The Piper's Dojo Team. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Andrew Douglas and the Piper's Dojo Team, Andrew Douglas, and The Piper's Dojo Team or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://podcastplayer.com/legal.

Is there a better way to score pipe band competitions?

This week, Andrew and Jim look at an unlikely comparison for inspiration: gymnastics. From artistic vs. objective elements, to the challenge of ranking large fields fairly, to the ever-present issue of bias, the guys explore what the world of sports can teach us about how pipe bands are judged. What makes a fair system? Should pipe bands stick to ordinal rankings? Would point-based scoring bring more consistency? And how do we balance tradition with the need for innovation?

Got a topic you’d like us to cover in a future episode? Leave a comment or email us: [email protected]

Here’s what we cover this week:

  • 00:00 – Andrew’s secret gymnastics passion revealed
  • 01:32 – Jim’s school days and flexibility struggles
  • 03:00 – Comparing movement and body types
  • 04:50 – The basics of gymnastics events and routines
  • 06:00 – Artistic vs. objective elements in gymnastics
  • 07:15 – How gymnastics is scored: D and E panels explained
  • 10:00 – The challenge of making subjective performances objective
  • 12:00 – Pipe band scoring vs. gymnastics scoring
  • 14:00 – Why not just rank gymnasts? The case for point-based systems
  • 16:00 – The problem with ordinal ranking in pipe bands
  • 18:00 – Handling ties, large fields, and the importance of standardization
  • 20:00 – The “big three” for judging bagpipe performances: sound, technique, musicality
  • 23:00 – The complexity of creating a fair, repeatable rubric
  • 25:00 – Bias, recency, and the human side of judging
  • 28:00 – The need for more judges and the realities of competition logistics
  • 31:00 – The importance of strong, sustainable institutions
  • 34:00 – Innovation vs. tradition in competition systems
  • 36:00 – Final thoughts
  continue reading

463 episodes

Artwork
iconShare
 
Manage episode 503747953 series 1425341
Content provided by Andrew Douglas and the Piper's Dojo Team, Andrew Douglas, and The Piper's Dojo Team. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Andrew Douglas and the Piper's Dojo Team, Andrew Douglas, and The Piper's Dojo Team or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://podcastplayer.com/legal.

Is there a better way to score pipe band competitions?

This week, Andrew and Jim look at an unlikely comparison for inspiration: gymnastics. From artistic vs. objective elements, to the challenge of ranking large fields fairly, to the ever-present issue of bias, the guys explore what the world of sports can teach us about how pipe bands are judged. What makes a fair system? Should pipe bands stick to ordinal rankings? Would point-based scoring bring more consistency? And how do we balance tradition with the need for innovation?

Got a topic you’d like us to cover in a future episode? Leave a comment or email us: [email protected]

Here’s what we cover this week:

  • 00:00 – Andrew’s secret gymnastics passion revealed
  • 01:32 – Jim’s school days and flexibility struggles
  • 03:00 – Comparing movement and body types
  • 04:50 – The basics of gymnastics events and routines
  • 06:00 – Artistic vs. objective elements in gymnastics
  • 07:15 – How gymnastics is scored: D and E panels explained
  • 10:00 – The challenge of making subjective performances objective
  • 12:00 – Pipe band scoring vs. gymnastics scoring
  • 14:00 – Why not just rank gymnasts? The case for point-based systems
  • 16:00 – The problem with ordinal ranking in pipe bands
  • 18:00 – Handling ties, large fields, and the importance of standardization
  • 20:00 – The “big three” for judging bagpipe performances: sound, technique, musicality
  • 23:00 – The complexity of creating a fair, repeatable rubric
  • 25:00 – Bias, recency, and the human side of judging
  • 28:00 – The need for more judges and the realities of competition logistics
  • 31:00 – The importance of strong, sustainable institutions
  • 34:00 – Innovation vs. tradition in competition systems
  • 36:00 – Final thoughts
  continue reading

463 episodes

All episodes

×
 
Loading …

Welcome to Player FM!

Player FM is scanning the web for high-quality podcasts for you to enjoy right now. It's the best podcast app and works on Android, iPhone, and the web. Signup to sync subscriptions across devices.

 

Copyright 2025 | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | | Copyright
Listen to this show while you explore
Play