Search a title or topic

Over 20 million podcasts, powered by 

Player FM logo
Artwork

Content provided by owith.ai. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by owith.ai or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://podcastplayer.com/legal.
Player FM - Podcast App
Go offline with the Player FM app!

Venture Capitalists Debate AI Bubble, Databricks' Growth Ambitions, and Gender Bias in CEO Activism

4:01
 
Share
 

Manage episode 523667354 series 3456961
Content provided by owith.ai. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by owith.ai or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://podcastplayer.com/legal.
Good morning from OWITH.ai, the podcast that gives you only what's important to hear in the AI and tech world.In a recent event hosted by Fortune in San Francisco, five venture capitalists shared their views on whether the AI industry is experiencing a bubble. These venture capitalists, representing funds ranging from $5 million to $25 billion, plan to collectively invest significant amounts in AI companies over the next decade. Opinions varied from cautious to optimistic. Jenny Xiao from Leonsis Capital noted a "relatively contained" bubble, mainly in infrastructure investments like data centers and GPUs, but emphasized underinvestment in AI's application layer, suggesting opportunities for impactful enterprise applications. Vanessa Larco of Premise argued that consumer AI products might outlast enterprise solutions due to rapid adoption driven by efficiency and ease of use. Meanwhile, Rob Biederman of Asymmetric Capital Partners offered a more sobering perspective, citing historical patterns where most companies fail during booms, with only a few becoming giants. He emphasized the necessity for companies to create real value for customers to survive. Aaron Jacobson from NEA reflected on the cyclical nature of technological innovation, predicting short-term overhype but long-term underappreciation of AI's potential. Daniel Dart of Rock Yard Ventures likened AI's potential value creation to the discovery of fire and dismissed fears of a bubble by predicting the emergence of trillion-dollar AI companies by 2030 or 2034. The conversation highlighted diverse perspectives on AI's trajectory, emphasizing both challenges and opportunities as investments grow.Transitioning now to another significant event in San Francisco, Databricks, led by CEO Ali Ghodsi, aims to join the trillion-dollar valuation club by expanding into three main growth areas: entering the transactional database market, developing Agent Bricks for creating AI agents using proprietary enterprise data, and building applications with AI tools. CoreWeave's recent IPO has seen fluctuating stock prices, though CEO Michael Intrator views it as a success despite market volatility. In robotics, Arm CEO Rene Haas predicts that AI-powered humanoid robots will revolutionize factory operations within five to ten years. Unlike traditional robots designed for specific tasks, these general-purpose robots can adapt to various roles through simple reprogramming—implications for displaced workers remain unclear.Additional tech news includes SpaceX's anticipated IPO aiming for a $1.5 trillion valuation in 2026 and geopolitical tech tensions affecting Nvidia's market access in China.Shifting focus now to an article highlighting the disproportionate targeting of female CEOs by activist investors—a trend costing corporate America significantly. Despite women representing only 8% of CEOs in the Russell 3000 index, they accounted for 15% of activist campaigns. The report suggests female CEOs are as likely to be removed regardless of performance compared to male counterparts. This situation may deter boards from appointing women or discourage women from seeking these positions.In other news, recent studies have challenged the assumption that human-AI collaboration always yields the best results. A study by Vals AI found that AI applications outperformed human lawyers in legal research tasks. Criticisms of this study include its exclusion of widely-used legal AI tools and testing only ChatGPT among general-purpose models. In advertising, research found that ads created entirely by AI were more effective than those created or edited by humans. However, revealing ads' AI origins diminished consumer in

Support the show

Thanks for listening! Follow us on Twitter, Instagram and Linkedin

  continue reading

82 episodes

Artwork
iconShare
 
Manage episode 523667354 series 3456961
Content provided by owith.ai. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by owith.ai or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://podcastplayer.com/legal.
Good morning from OWITH.ai, the podcast that gives you only what's important to hear in the AI and tech world.In a recent event hosted by Fortune in San Francisco, five venture capitalists shared their views on whether the AI industry is experiencing a bubble. These venture capitalists, representing funds ranging from $5 million to $25 billion, plan to collectively invest significant amounts in AI companies over the next decade. Opinions varied from cautious to optimistic. Jenny Xiao from Leonsis Capital noted a "relatively contained" bubble, mainly in infrastructure investments like data centers and GPUs, but emphasized underinvestment in AI's application layer, suggesting opportunities for impactful enterprise applications. Vanessa Larco of Premise argued that consumer AI products might outlast enterprise solutions due to rapid adoption driven by efficiency and ease of use. Meanwhile, Rob Biederman of Asymmetric Capital Partners offered a more sobering perspective, citing historical patterns where most companies fail during booms, with only a few becoming giants. He emphasized the necessity for companies to create real value for customers to survive. Aaron Jacobson from NEA reflected on the cyclical nature of technological innovation, predicting short-term overhype but long-term underappreciation of AI's potential. Daniel Dart of Rock Yard Ventures likened AI's potential value creation to the discovery of fire and dismissed fears of a bubble by predicting the emergence of trillion-dollar AI companies by 2030 or 2034. The conversation highlighted diverse perspectives on AI's trajectory, emphasizing both challenges and opportunities as investments grow.Transitioning now to another significant event in San Francisco, Databricks, led by CEO Ali Ghodsi, aims to join the trillion-dollar valuation club by expanding into three main growth areas: entering the transactional database market, developing Agent Bricks for creating AI agents using proprietary enterprise data, and building applications with AI tools. CoreWeave's recent IPO has seen fluctuating stock prices, though CEO Michael Intrator views it as a success despite market volatility. In robotics, Arm CEO Rene Haas predicts that AI-powered humanoid robots will revolutionize factory operations within five to ten years. Unlike traditional robots designed for specific tasks, these general-purpose robots can adapt to various roles through simple reprogramming—implications for displaced workers remain unclear.Additional tech news includes SpaceX's anticipated IPO aiming for a $1.5 trillion valuation in 2026 and geopolitical tech tensions affecting Nvidia's market access in China.Shifting focus now to an article highlighting the disproportionate targeting of female CEOs by activist investors—a trend costing corporate America significantly. Despite women representing only 8% of CEOs in the Russell 3000 index, they accounted for 15% of activist campaigns. The report suggests female CEOs are as likely to be removed regardless of performance compared to male counterparts. This situation may deter boards from appointing women or discourage women from seeking these positions.In other news, recent studies have challenged the assumption that human-AI collaboration always yields the best results. A study by Vals AI found that AI applications outperformed human lawyers in legal research tasks. Criticisms of this study include its exclusion of widely-used legal AI tools and testing only ChatGPT among general-purpose models. In advertising, research found that ads created entirely by AI were more effective than those created or edited by humans. However, revealing ads' AI origins diminished consumer in

Support the show

Thanks for listening! Follow us on Twitter, Instagram and Linkedin

  continue reading

82 episodes

All episodes

×
 
Loading …

Welcome to Player FM!

Player FM is scanning the web for high-quality podcasts for you to enjoy right now. It's the best podcast app and works on Android, iPhone, and the web. Signup to sync subscriptions across devices.

 

Copyright 2025 | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | | Copyright
Listen to this show while you explore
Play