Impacted canines, what’s the latest? Part 1 | 6 MINUTE SUMMARY

orthodontics In summary

Content provided by Farooq Ahmed. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Farooq Ahmed or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.

3M ago 6:30

MP3•Episode home

Join me for a summary of the management of impacted canines, the latest evidence regarding different techniques for alignment. This podcast is based on an excellent lecture by Julia Naoumova delivered at last year’s British Orthodontic Conference.

Part 1 will focus on recent findings of a modified open exposure technique Vs closed exposure, in terms of duration but also other key outcomes, health, pain, use of analgesics, time absent from school and costs. The next episode, part 2, will look at the prognosis of resorbed incisors related to impacted canines long term.

Previous research no difference between closed Vs open exposure for alignment, aesthetics, treatment time, surgical success, treatment times. Limited to 2D views Parkin 2017, Sampaziotis 2018, Cassina 2018.

Questionnaire of current decision making of open Vs closed: n=48 orthodontists = current clinical decision making by orthodontists based on preference Naoumova 2018

Multicentre RCT Margitha Björksved 2018, 2021

Modified open exposure with Glass ionomer OPen Exposure, first described by Nordenval 1999
6/12 of spontaneous eruption
Traction with orthodontic appliances

Results

Total time: no difference 26 months (95% CI −3.2 to 2.9, P = 0.93)
Canine eruption time: Open exposure quicker by 3 months 8.5 months Vs 11.5 months (95% CI 1.1 to 4.9, P = 0.002). With no traction in open exposure group
No difference in periodontal status, root resorption, surgery time, complications,
Pain: greater in closed group

Greater pain with bilateral open exposure
Closed exposure more painful applying traction

Analgesics use (preliminary data):

Day 1 nearly all patients use
Day 5 drops to less than 50% of patients use
Day 10 most have stopped taking analgesics

Costs: – no difference

€3,400 healthcare costs
€6,300 including patient costs

Missed days of school (preliminary data)

Day 1 - 76% open Vs 65% closed exposure
Day 2 - 3% open Vs 6% closed exposure

Open exposure with GOPEX Not appropriate for:

Close to adjacent tooth, to avoid material on adjacent teeth
Very high canine position
Older patient – start traction straight away, probability of ankylosis increases Cernochova 2024

1% at age 15
4% at age 20
14% at age 25
97% at age 45

Conclusion:

Both open and closed techniques are viable, however with open exposure of GOPEX technique the canine erupts spontaneously and quicker
Less pain with open exposure unless bilateral
Most patient will miss 1-2 days from school
Pain relief common for the first 5 days, but maybe used until day 10

Papers

Open vs closed surgical exposure of palatally displaced canines: a comparison of clinical and patient-reported outcomes—a multicentre, randomized controlled trial

Margitha Björksved

Open and closed surgical exposure of palatally displaced canines: a cost-minimization analysis of a multicentre, randomized controlled trial

Margitha Björksved

129 episodes

#Podcasting Education #Farooq Ahmed