Search a title or topic

Over 20 million podcasts, powered by 

Player FM logo
Artwork

Content provided by Opening Arguments Media LLC. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Opening Arguments Media LLC or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.
Player FM - Podcast App
Go offline with the Player FM app!

Do You Swear You're Not A Subversive Person?

54:53
 
Share
 

Manage episode 505140740 series 2387036
Content provided by Opening Arguments Media LLC. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Opening Arguments Media LLC or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://podcastplayer.com/legal.

Continuing their "Good Law" series, Matt and Jenessa talk about Baggett v. Bullitt. This case held that "a State cannot require an employee to take an unduly vague oath containing a promise of future conduct at the risk of prosecution for perjury or loss of employment, particularly where the exercise of First Amendment freedoms may thereby be deterred." Jenessa gives a fascinating science breakdown on cognitive dissonance and what the effect of these vague oaths actually is. It's counter-intuitive and very interesting!

  continue reading

1132 episodes

Artwork
iconShare
 
Manage episode 505140740 series 2387036
Content provided by Opening Arguments Media LLC. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Opening Arguments Media LLC or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://podcastplayer.com/legal.

Continuing their "Good Law" series, Matt and Jenessa talk about Baggett v. Bullitt. This case held that "a State cannot require an employee to take an unduly vague oath containing a promise of future conduct at the risk of prosecution for perjury or loss of employment, particularly where the exercise of First Amendment freedoms may thereby be deterred." Jenessa gives a fascinating science breakdown on cognitive dissonance and what the effect of these vague oaths actually is. It's counter-intuitive and very interesting!

  continue reading

1132 episodes

All episodes

×
 
Loading …

Welcome to Player FM!

Player FM is scanning the web for high-quality podcasts for you to enjoy right now. It's the best podcast app and works on Android, iPhone, and the web. Signup to sync subscriptions across devices.

 

Copyright 2025 | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | | Copyright
Listen to this show while you explore
Play