Search a title or topic

Over 20 million podcasts, powered by 

Player FM logo
Artwork

Content provided by Mint Views Daily Dispatch and Mint - HT Smartcast. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Mint Views Daily Dispatch and Mint - HT Smartcast or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://podcastplayer.com/legal.
Player FM - Podcast App
Go offline with the Player FM app!

28: Sabarimala issue: gender equality vs freedom of religion

8:59
 
Share
 

Manage episode 254220834 series 2624848
Content provided by Mint Views Daily Dispatch and Mint - HT Smartcast. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Mint Views Daily Dispatch and Mint - HT Smartcast or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://podcastplayer.com/legal.

A five-judge bench of the Supreme Court has referred the review of its judgment in the Sabarimala case to a larger seven-judge bench. In its 2018 ruling, the top court had ordered that menstruating women must also be allowed to enter the temple. The petitioners, however, argue that this violates their freedom to religion. So are women being discriminated against or are religious practices being meddled with?

  continue reading

69 episodes

Artwork
iconShare
 
Manage episode 254220834 series 2624848
Content provided by Mint Views Daily Dispatch and Mint - HT Smartcast. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Mint Views Daily Dispatch and Mint - HT Smartcast or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://podcastplayer.com/legal.

A five-judge bench of the Supreme Court has referred the review of its judgment in the Sabarimala case to a larger seven-judge bench. In its 2018 ruling, the top court had ordered that menstruating women must also be allowed to enter the temple. The petitioners, however, argue that this violates their freedom to religion. So are women being discriminated against or are religious practices being meddled with?

  continue reading

69 episodes

All episodes

×
 
Loading …

Welcome to Player FM!

Player FM is scanning the web for high-quality podcasts for you to enjoy right now. It's the best podcast app and works on Android, iPhone, and the web. Signup to sync subscriptions across devices.

 

Listen to this show while you explore
Play