Search a title or topic

Over 20 million podcasts, powered by 

Player FM logo
Artwork

Content provided by Ben Jaffe and Katie Malone, Ben Jaffe, and Katie Malone. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Ben Jaffe and Katie Malone, Ben Jaffe, and Katie Malone or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.
Player FM - Podcast App
Go offline with the Player FM app!

Running experiments when there are network effects

24:45
 
Share
 

Manage episode 251578557 series 74115
Content provided by Ben Jaffe and Katie Malone, Ben Jaffe, and Katie Malone. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Ben Jaffe and Katie Malone, Ben Jaffe, and Katie Malone or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://podcastplayer.com/legal.
Traditional A/B tests assume that whether or not one person got a treatment has no effect on the experiment outcome for another person. But that’s not a safe assumption, especially when there are network effects (like in almost any social context, for instance!) SUTVA, or the stable treatment unit value assumption, is a big phrase for this assumption and violations of SUTVA make for some pretty interesting experiment designs. From news feeds in LinkedIn to disentangling herd immunity from individual immunity in vaccine studies, indirect (i.e. network) effects in experiments can be just as big as, or even bigger than, direct (i.e. individual effects). And this is what we talk about this week on the podcast. Relevant links: http://hanj.cs.illinois.edu/pdf/www15_hgui.pdf https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2600548/pdf/nihms-73860.pdf
  continue reading

293 episodes

Artwork
iconShare
 
Manage episode 251578557 series 74115
Content provided by Ben Jaffe and Katie Malone, Ben Jaffe, and Katie Malone. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Ben Jaffe and Katie Malone, Ben Jaffe, and Katie Malone or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://podcastplayer.com/legal.
Traditional A/B tests assume that whether or not one person got a treatment has no effect on the experiment outcome for another person. But that’s not a safe assumption, especially when there are network effects (like in almost any social context, for instance!) SUTVA, or the stable treatment unit value assumption, is a big phrase for this assumption and violations of SUTVA make for some pretty interesting experiment designs. From news feeds in LinkedIn to disentangling herd immunity from individual immunity in vaccine studies, indirect (i.e. network) effects in experiments can be just as big as, or even bigger than, direct (i.e. individual effects). And this is what we talk about this week on the podcast. Relevant links: http://hanj.cs.illinois.edu/pdf/www15_hgui.pdf https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2600548/pdf/nihms-73860.pdf
  continue reading

293 episodes

All episodes

×
 
Loading …

Welcome to Player FM!

Player FM is scanning the web for high-quality podcasts for you to enjoy right now. It's the best podcast app and works on Android, iPhone, and the web. Signup to sync subscriptions across devices.

 

Copyright 2025 | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | | Copyright
Listen to this show while you explore
Play