Search a title or topic

Over 20 million podcasts, powered by 

Player FM logo
Artwork

Content provided by LessWrong. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by LessWrong or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://podcastplayer.com/legal.
Player FM - Podcast App
Go offline with the Player FM app!

“You’re probably overestimating how well you understand Dunning-Kruger” by abstractapplic

7:40
 
Share
 

Manage episode 509323827 series 3364758
Content provided by LessWrong. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by LessWrong or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://podcastplayer.com/legal.
I
The popular conception of Dunning-Kruger is something along the lines of “some people are too dumb to know they’re dumb, and end up thinking they’re smarter than smart people”. This version is popularized in endless articles and videos, as well as in graphs like the one below.
Usually I'd credit the creator of this graph but it seems rude to do that when I'm ragging on them Except that's wrong.
II
The canonical Dunning-Kruger graph looks like this:
Notice that all the dots are in the right order: being bad at something doesn’t make you think you’re good at it, and at worst damages your ability to notice exactly how incompetent you are. The actual findings of professors Dunning and Kruger are more consistent with “people are biased to think they’re moderately above-average, and update away from that bias based on their competence or lack thereof, but they don’t [...]
---
Outline:
(00:12) I
(00:39) II
(01:32) III
(04:22) IV
---
First published:
September 29th, 2025
Source:
https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/Di9muNKLA33swbHBa/you-re-probably-overestimating-how-well-you-understand
---
Narrated by TYPE III AUDIO.
---
Images from the article:
Usually I'd credit the creator of this graph but it seems rude to do that when I'm ragging on them
An actual graph from one of Dunning's papers, for comparison.
That graph again, for reference
Wow, people who get unlucky guessing coinflips are super overconfident, aren’t they?
  continue reading

624 episodes

Artwork
iconShare
 
Manage episode 509323827 series 3364758
Content provided by LessWrong. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by LessWrong or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://podcastplayer.com/legal.
I
The popular conception of Dunning-Kruger is something along the lines of “some people are too dumb to know they’re dumb, and end up thinking they’re smarter than smart people”. This version is popularized in endless articles and videos, as well as in graphs like the one below.
Usually I'd credit the creator of this graph but it seems rude to do that when I'm ragging on them Except that's wrong.
II
The canonical Dunning-Kruger graph looks like this:
Notice that all the dots are in the right order: being bad at something doesn’t make you think you’re good at it, and at worst damages your ability to notice exactly how incompetent you are. The actual findings of professors Dunning and Kruger are more consistent with “people are biased to think they’re moderately above-average, and update away from that bias based on their competence or lack thereof, but they don’t [...]
---
Outline:
(00:12) I
(00:39) II
(01:32) III
(04:22) IV
---
First published:
September 29th, 2025
Source:
https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/Di9muNKLA33swbHBa/you-re-probably-overestimating-how-well-you-understand
---
Narrated by TYPE III AUDIO.
---
Images from the article:
Usually I'd credit the creator of this graph but it seems rude to do that when I'm ragging on them
An actual graph from one of Dunning's papers, for comparison.
That graph again, for reference
Wow, people who get unlucky guessing coinflips are super overconfident, aren’t they?
  continue reading

624 episodes

All episodes

×
 
Loading …

Welcome to Player FM!

Player FM is scanning the web for high-quality podcasts for you to enjoy right now. It's the best podcast app and works on Android, iPhone, and the web. Signup to sync subscriptions across devices.

 

Copyright 2025 | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | | Copyright
Listen to this show while you explore
Play