Search a title or topic

Over 20 million podcasts, powered by 

Player FM logo
Artwork

Content provided by LessWrong. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by LessWrong or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.
Player FM - Podcast App
Go offline with the Player FM app!

“Varieties Of Doom” by jdp

1:38:48
 
Share
 

Manage episode 520411480 series 3364758
Content provided by LessWrong. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by LessWrong or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://podcastplayer.com/legal.
There has been a lot of talk about "p(doom)"over the last few years. This has always rubbed me the wrong waybecause "p(doom)" didn't feel like it mapped to any specific belief in my head.In private conversations I'd sometimes give my p(doom) as 12%, with the caveatthat "doom" seemed nebulous and conflated between several different concepts.At some point it was decideda p(doom) over 10% makes you a "doomer" because it means what actions you should take with respect toAI are overdetermined. I did not and do not feel that is true. But any time Ifelt prompted to explain my position I'd find I could explain a little bit ofthis or that, but not really convey the whole thing. As it turns out doom hasa lot of parts, and every part is entangled with every other part so no matterwhich part you explain you always feel like you're leaving the crucial parts out. Doom ismore like an onion than asingle event, a distribution over AI outcomes people frequentlyrespond to with the force of the fear of death. Some of these outcomes are lessthan death and some [...]
---
Outline:
(03:46) 1. Existential Ennui
(06:40) 2. Not Getting Immortalist Luxury Gay Space Communism
(13:55) 3. Human Stock Expended As Cannon Fodder Faster Than Replacement
(19:37) 4. Wiped Out By AI Successor Species
(27:57) 5. The Paperclipper
(42:56) Would AI Successors Be Conscious Beings?
(44:58) Would AI Successors Care About Each Other?
(49:51) Would AI Successors Want To Have Fun?
(51:11) VNM Utility And Human Values
(55:57) Would AI successors get bored?
(01:00:16) Would AI Successors Avoid Wireheading?
(01:06:07) Would AI Successors Do Continual Active Learning?
(01:06:35) Would AI Successors Have The Subjective Experience of Will?
(01:12:00) Multiply
(01:15:07) 6. Recipes For Ruin
(01:18:02) Radiological and Nuclear
(01:19:19) Cybersecurity
(01:23:00) Biotech and Nanotech
(01:26:35) 7. Large-Finite Damnation
---
First published:
November 17th, 2025
Source:
https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/apHWSGDiydv3ivmg6/varieties-of-doom
---
Narrated by TYPE III AUDIO.
---
Images from the article:
Two horizontal bar charts comparing Conservative TrueSkill scores for best and worst life experiences.
Graph showing horse population decline versus car prices and horsepower from 1900-1960.
  continue reading

683 episodes

Artwork
iconShare
 
Manage episode 520411480 series 3364758
Content provided by LessWrong. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by LessWrong or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://podcastplayer.com/legal.
There has been a lot of talk about "p(doom)"over the last few years. This has always rubbed me the wrong waybecause "p(doom)" didn't feel like it mapped to any specific belief in my head.In private conversations I'd sometimes give my p(doom) as 12%, with the caveatthat "doom" seemed nebulous and conflated between several different concepts.At some point it was decideda p(doom) over 10% makes you a "doomer" because it means what actions you should take with respect toAI are overdetermined. I did not and do not feel that is true. But any time Ifelt prompted to explain my position I'd find I could explain a little bit ofthis or that, but not really convey the whole thing. As it turns out doom hasa lot of parts, and every part is entangled with every other part so no matterwhich part you explain you always feel like you're leaving the crucial parts out. Doom ismore like an onion than asingle event, a distribution over AI outcomes people frequentlyrespond to with the force of the fear of death. Some of these outcomes are lessthan death and some [...]
---
Outline:
(03:46) 1. Existential Ennui
(06:40) 2. Not Getting Immortalist Luxury Gay Space Communism
(13:55) 3. Human Stock Expended As Cannon Fodder Faster Than Replacement
(19:37) 4. Wiped Out By AI Successor Species
(27:57) 5. The Paperclipper
(42:56) Would AI Successors Be Conscious Beings?
(44:58) Would AI Successors Care About Each Other?
(49:51) Would AI Successors Want To Have Fun?
(51:11) VNM Utility And Human Values
(55:57) Would AI successors get bored?
(01:00:16) Would AI Successors Avoid Wireheading?
(01:06:07) Would AI Successors Do Continual Active Learning?
(01:06:35) Would AI Successors Have The Subjective Experience of Will?
(01:12:00) Multiply
(01:15:07) 6. Recipes For Ruin
(01:18:02) Radiological and Nuclear
(01:19:19) Cybersecurity
(01:23:00) Biotech and Nanotech
(01:26:35) 7. Large-Finite Damnation
---
First published:
November 17th, 2025
Source:
https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/apHWSGDiydv3ivmg6/varieties-of-doom
---
Narrated by TYPE III AUDIO.
---
Images from the article:
Two horizontal bar charts comparing Conservative TrueSkill scores for best and worst life experiences.
Graph showing horse population decline versus car prices and horsepower from 1900-1960.
  continue reading

683 episodes

Todos los episodios

×
 
Loading …

Welcome to Player FM!

Player FM is scanning the web for high-quality podcasts for you to enjoy right now. It's the best podcast app and works on Android, iPhone, and the web. Signup to sync subscriptions across devices.

 

Copyright 2025 | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | | Copyright
Listen to this show while you explore
Play