False PTO Narratives and the Urgent Need for PTAB Reform

IPWatchdog Unleashed

Content provided by Gene Quinn. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Gene Quinn or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://podcastplayer.com/legal.

6M ago 31:00

MP3•Episode home

On the heels of the PREVAIL Act passing in the Senate Judiciary Committee, the very next day USPTO Director Kathi Vidal wrote on the Director’s Blog about how wonderful the PTAB has been, saying in part: “Since AIA proceedings began over a decade ago, almost 70% of challenged patents have been upheld at the PTAB.”

This claim by Director Vidal initially made me speechless. Simply stated, she is wrong. It is absolutely false for anyone to say or suggest that 70% of challenged patents have been upheld at the PTAB. This claim is not true. It is pure fiction.
PTAB stats admit that out of those patents that reach a final written decision 85% lose at least one claim and 70% lost all claims. That is the reality for patent owners. If the PTAB issues a final decision you are virtually certain to lose, and these statistics have largely remained unchanged, with only minimal fluctuation since the inception of the PTAB in 2012.
So, exactly who is fooling who? The way the rules are structured, and the way we have actually witnessed the PTAB operate, confirms that no patent is safe ever. And this is not meant as any indictment of PTAB judges—they are just doing the job as defined in the staute passed by Congress and the rules created by the PTO. This is, however, a scathing indictment of those laws and rules, which are in desperate need of reform.

Visit us online at IPWatchdog.com.
You can also visit our channels at YouTube, LinkedIn, X, Instagram and Facebook.

50 episodes

#News Talk #News #Gene Quinn