Search a title or topic

Over 20 million podcasts, powered by 

Player FM logo
Artwork

Content provided by Dev. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Dev or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://podcastplayer.com/legal.
Player FM - Podcast App
Go offline with the Player FM app!

Multimodality agents using No Code tools

6:39
 
Share
 

Manage episode 499978707 series 3134284
Content provided by Dev. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Dev or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://podcastplayer.com/legal.

In this episode of HackrlIfe I take as a critical look at Samsung's research on building "multimodal AI agents" using no-code platforms like Flowise.

While the paper sounds impressive with terms like "multimodal LLM-based Multi-Agent Systems," I dug into what these tools actually do versus the marketing hype.

What I Found It Really Is: API orchestration tools that connect existing AI services (OpenAI, Stable Diffusion, Luma AI) through visual drag-and-drop interfaces.

You're not building AI – you're chaining together existing APIs with better UX.

Where I Think It Actually Works:

  • Routine content workflow automation (blog posts → social media variants)
  • Customer research processing (audio transcription → analysis → reporting)
  • Basic content generation pipelines
  • Repetitive multimedia tasks that don't require complex business logic

The Real Value I See: Speed of implementation and iteration for non-technical teams. Instead of waiting weeks for developer resources, growth teams can prototype automation workflows in days.

  • Not revolutionary AI development – just workflow automation with AI APIs
  • Limited by underlying API capabilities – you can't create custom logic
  • Costs scale with usage – multiple paid APIs add up quickly
  • Quality still requires human oversight – automation ≠ autonomous operation

I believe tools like Flowise are useful for operational efficiency, not AI innovation. They're worth exploring if you have routine, rule-based content tasks that currently eat up team time. But I recommend approaching them as workflow automation tools, not magical AI solutions.

My advice: Start small, test one simple use case, measure time savings, then expand gradually if it proves valuable.

My main insight: The competitive advantage isn't in the AI capabilities – it's in reducing friction between having an automation idea and implementing it.

In this episode, I give growth professionals a realistic assessment of what these tools can actually do for their teams.

  continue reading

27 episodes

Artwork
iconShare
 
Manage episode 499978707 series 3134284
Content provided by Dev. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Dev or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://podcastplayer.com/legal.

In this episode of HackrlIfe I take as a critical look at Samsung's research on building "multimodal AI agents" using no-code platforms like Flowise.

While the paper sounds impressive with terms like "multimodal LLM-based Multi-Agent Systems," I dug into what these tools actually do versus the marketing hype.

What I Found It Really Is: API orchestration tools that connect existing AI services (OpenAI, Stable Diffusion, Luma AI) through visual drag-and-drop interfaces.

You're not building AI – you're chaining together existing APIs with better UX.

Where I Think It Actually Works:

  • Routine content workflow automation (blog posts → social media variants)
  • Customer research processing (audio transcription → analysis → reporting)
  • Basic content generation pipelines
  • Repetitive multimedia tasks that don't require complex business logic

The Real Value I See: Speed of implementation and iteration for non-technical teams. Instead of waiting weeks for developer resources, growth teams can prototype automation workflows in days.

  • Not revolutionary AI development – just workflow automation with AI APIs
  • Limited by underlying API capabilities – you can't create custom logic
  • Costs scale with usage – multiple paid APIs add up quickly
  • Quality still requires human oversight – automation ≠ autonomous operation

I believe tools like Flowise are useful for operational efficiency, not AI innovation. They're worth exploring if you have routine, rule-based content tasks that currently eat up team time. But I recommend approaching them as workflow automation tools, not magical AI solutions.

My advice: Start small, test one simple use case, measure time savings, then expand gradually if it proves valuable.

My main insight: The competitive advantage isn't in the AI capabilities – it's in reducing friction between having an automation idea and implementing it.

In this episode, I give growth professionals a realistic assessment of what these tools can actually do for their teams.

  continue reading

27 episodes

All episodes

×
 
Loading …

Welcome to Player FM!

Player FM is scanning the web for high-quality podcasts for you to enjoy right now. It's the best podcast app and works on Android, iPhone, and the web. Signup to sync subscriptions across devices.

 

Copyright 2025 | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | | Copyright
Listen to this show while you explore
Play