Search a title or topic

Over 20 million podcasts, powered by 

Player FM logo
Artwork

Content provided by HPR Volunteer and Hacker Public Radio. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by HPR Volunteer and Hacker Public Radio or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://podcastplayer.com/legal.
Player FM - Podcast App
Go offline with the Player FM app!

HPR4476: Does AI cause brain damage?

 
Share
 

Manage episode 508965439 series 44008
Content provided by HPR Volunteer and Hacker Public Radio. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by HPR Volunteer and Hacker Public Radio or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://podcastplayer.com/legal.

This show has been flagged as Explicit by the host.

Quick-Glance Summary

  • I walk you through an MIT experiment where 54 EEG-capped volunteers wrote essays three ways: pure brainpower, classic search, and ChatGPT assistance.
  • Brain-only writers lit up the most neurons and produced the freshest prose; the ChatGPT crowd churned out near-identical essays, remembered little, and racked up what the researchers dub cognitive debt : the interest you pay later for outsourcing thought today.
  • A bonus “switch” round yanked AI away from the LLM devotees (cue face-plant) and finally let the brain-first team play with the toy (they coped fine), proving skills first, tools second.
  • I spiced the tale with calculator nostalgia, a Belgian med-exam cheating fiasco, and Professor Felienne’s forklift-in-the-gym metaphor to land one mantra: *scaffolds beat shortcuts*.
  • We peeked at tech “enshittification” once investors demand returns, whispered “open-source” as the escape hatch, and I dared you to try a two-day test—outline solo, draft with AI, revise solo, then check what you still remember.
  • Net takeaway: keep AI on a leash; let thinking drive, tools navigate .
  • If you think I’m full of digital hot air, record your own rebuttal and prove it.

Resources

MIT study

Long term consequences

(to be honest - pulled these from another list, didn't check all of them)

Podcast episodes that inspired some thoughts

Provide feedback on this episode.

  continue reading

160 episodes

Artwork
iconShare
 
Manage episode 508965439 series 44008
Content provided by HPR Volunteer and Hacker Public Radio. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by HPR Volunteer and Hacker Public Radio or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://podcastplayer.com/legal.

This show has been flagged as Explicit by the host.

Quick-Glance Summary

  • I walk you through an MIT experiment where 54 EEG-capped volunteers wrote essays three ways: pure brainpower, classic search, and ChatGPT assistance.
  • Brain-only writers lit up the most neurons and produced the freshest prose; the ChatGPT crowd churned out near-identical essays, remembered little, and racked up what the researchers dub cognitive debt : the interest you pay later for outsourcing thought today.
  • A bonus “switch” round yanked AI away from the LLM devotees (cue face-plant) and finally let the brain-first team play with the toy (they coped fine), proving skills first, tools second.
  • I spiced the tale with calculator nostalgia, a Belgian med-exam cheating fiasco, and Professor Felienne’s forklift-in-the-gym metaphor to land one mantra: *scaffolds beat shortcuts*.
  • We peeked at tech “enshittification” once investors demand returns, whispered “open-source” as the escape hatch, and I dared you to try a two-day test—outline solo, draft with AI, revise solo, then check what you still remember.
  • Net takeaway: keep AI on a leash; let thinking drive, tools navigate .
  • If you think I’m full of digital hot air, record your own rebuttal and prove it.

Resources

MIT study

Long term consequences

(to be honest - pulled these from another list, didn't check all of them)

Podcast episodes that inspired some thoughts

Provide feedback on this episode.

  continue reading

160 episodes

All episodes

×
 
Loading …

Welcome to Player FM!

Player FM is scanning the web for high-quality podcasts for you to enjoy right now. It's the best podcast app and works on Android, iPhone, and the web. Signup to sync subscriptions across devices.

 

Copyright 2025 | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | | Copyright
Listen to this show while you explore
Play