Tough decisions rattle us all to the core. But for our guests on One Decision— the choices they are up against can also shape history. No pressure! They take us through all of their doubts, emotions and—sometimes unexpected--consequences. A fresh take on foreign policy. Hear the former head of Mi6, Sir Richard Dearlove alongside international journalists as they analyse, interview, and discuss.
…
continue reading
Content provided by The Federalist Society. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by The Federalist Society or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://podcastplayer.com/legal.
Player FM - Podcast App
Go offline with the Player FM app!
Go offline with the Player FM app!
FTC v. Meta: Requiem for the “War on Tech”?
MP3•Episode home
Manage episode 523764602 series 1782649
Content provided by The Federalist Society. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by The Federalist Society or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://podcastplayer.com/legal.
What does the district court’s recent decision in FTC v. Meta portend for the future of the technology sector, free expression, and modern antitrust enforcement? After years of litigation, Judge James Boasberg concluded that the FTC had not established that Meta possesses monopoly power in the relevant social-media market, foreclosing the agency’s bid to unwind Meta’s long-standing acquisitions of Instagram and WhatsApp.
The ruling has prompted vigorous commentary, including renewed debate over the proper role of courts in reviewing ambitious agency theories of market power and competitive harm.
Join our panel, featuring former FTC officials and veterans of the Trump Administration, for a timely discussion of the opinion, the critiques, and what this moment may signal for the trajectory of federal competition policy.
Featuring:
Jennifer Huddleston, Senior Fellow, Technology Policy, Cato Institute
Bilal Sayyed, Counsel, Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP
Daniel Suhr, President, Center for American Rights
(Moderator) Asheesh Agarwal, Consultant, American Edge Project and U.S. Chamber of Commerce
…
continue reading
The ruling has prompted vigorous commentary, including renewed debate over the proper role of courts in reviewing ambitious agency theories of market power and competitive harm.
Join our panel, featuring former FTC officials and veterans of the Trump Administration, for a timely discussion of the opinion, the critiques, and what this moment may signal for the trajectory of federal competition policy.
Featuring:
Jennifer Huddleston, Senior Fellow, Technology Policy, Cato Institute
Bilal Sayyed, Counsel, Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP
Daniel Suhr, President, Center for American Rights
(Moderator) Asheesh Agarwal, Consultant, American Edge Project and U.S. Chamber of Commerce
1034 episodes
MP3•Episode home
Manage episode 523764602 series 1782649
Content provided by The Federalist Society. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by The Federalist Society or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://podcastplayer.com/legal.
What does the district court’s recent decision in FTC v. Meta portend for the future of the technology sector, free expression, and modern antitrust enforcement? After years of litigation, Judge James Boasberg concluded that the FTC had not established that Meta possesses monopoly power in the relevant social-media market, foreclosing the agency’s bid to unwind Meta’s long-standing acquisitions of Instagram and WhatsApp.
The ruling has prompted vigorous commentary, including renewed debate over the proper role of courts in reviewing ambitious agency theories of market power and competitive harm.
Join our panel, featuring former FTC officials and veterans of the Trump Administration, for a timely discussion of the opinion, the critiques, and what this moment may signal for the trajectory of federal competition policy.
Featuring:
Jennifer Huddleston, Senior Fellow, Technology Policy, Cato Institute
Bilal Sayyed, Counsel, Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP
Daniel Suhr, President, Center for American Rights
(Moderator) Asheesh Agarwal, Consultant, American Edge Project and U.S. Chamber of Commerce
…
continue reading
The ruling has prompted vigorous commentary, including renewed debate over the proper role of courts in reviewing ambitious agency theories of market power and competitive harm.
Join our panel, featuring former FTC officials and veterans of the Trump Administration, for a timely discussion of the opinion, the critiques, and what this moment may signal for the trajectory of federal competition policy.
Featuring:
Jennifer Huddleston, Senior Fellow, Technology Policy, Cato Institute
Bilal Sayyed, Counsel, Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP
Daniel Suhr, President, Center for American Rights
(Moderator) Asheesh Agarwal, Consultant, American Edge Project and U.S. Chamber of Commerce
1034 episodes
All episodes
×Welcome to Player FM!
Player FM is scanning the web for high-quality podcasts for you to enjoy right now. It's the best podcast app and works on Android, iPhone, and the web. Signup to sync subscriptions across devices.