Tough decisions rattle us all to the core. But for our guests on One Decision— the choices they are up against can also shape history. No pressure! They take us through all of their doubts, emotions and—sometimes unexpected--consequences. A fresh take on foreign policy. Hear the former head of Mi6, Sir Richard Dearlove alongside international journalists as they analyse, interview, and discuss.
…
continue reading
Content provided by The Federalist Society. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by The Federalist Society or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.
Player FM - Podcast App
Go offline with the Player FM app!
Go offline with the Player FM app!
Courthouse Steps Oral Argument: Trump v. Slaughter
MP3•Episode home
Manage episode 523797436 series 1782649
Content provided by The Federalist Society. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by The Federalist Society or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://podcastplayer.com/legal.
Humphrey's Executor v. United States, decided in 1935, upheld the Federal Trade Commission Act, declaring that a president can remove an FTC commissioner only for “inefficiency, neglect of duty, or malfeasance in office.” In March 2025, FTC Commissioner Rebecca Kelly Slaughter was notified of her removal by President Trump, who stated in a letter that for her to remain an FTC commissioner was “inconsistent with [the] Administration’s priorities.” Slaughter won in district court, which ordered her reinstatement. After the D.C. Court of Appeals denied the government’s request for a stay, the Supreme Court granted certiorari and stayed the lower court’s ruling.
Join us for a discussion of oral arguments in Trump v. Slaughter and the questions it presents about separation of powers, for-cause removal, and the future of Humphrey's Executor.
Featuring:
Eli Nachmany, Associate, Covington & Burling LLP
(Moderator) Bilal Sayyed, Counsel, Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP
…
continue reading
Join us for a discussion of oral arguments in Trump v. Slaughter and the questions it presents about separation of powers, for-cause removal, and the future of Humphrey's Executor.
Featuring:
Eli Nachmany, Associate, Covington & Burling LLP
(Moderator) Bilal Sayyed, Counsel, Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP
1034 episodes
MP3•Episode home
Manage episode 523797436 series 1782649
Content provided by The Federalist Society. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by The Federalist Society or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://podcastplayer.com/legal.
Humphrey's Executor v. United States, decided in 1935, upheld the Federal Trade Commission Act, declaring that a president can remove an FTC commissioner only for “inefficiency, neglect of duty, or malfeasance in office.” In March 2025, FTC Commissioner Rebecca Kelly Slaughter was notified of her removal by President Trump, who stated in a letter that for her to remain an FTC commissioner was “inconsistent with [the] Administration’s priorities.” Slaughter won in district court, which ordered her reinstatement. After the D.C. Court of Appeals denied the government’s request for a stay, the Supreme Court granted certiorari and stayed the lower court’s ruling.
Join us for a discussion of oral arguments in Trump v. Slaughter and the questions it presents about separation of powers, for-cause removal, and the future of Humphrey's Executor.
Featuring:
Eli Nachmany, Associate, Covington & Burling LLP
(Moderator) Bilal Sayyed, Counsel, Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP
…
continue reading
Join us for a discussion of oral arguments in Trump v. Slaughter and the questions it presents about separation of powers, for-cause removal, and the future of Humphrey's Executor.
Featuring:
Eli Nachmany, Associate, Covington & Burling LLP
(Moderator) Bilal Sayyed, Counsel, Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP
1034 episodes
All episodes
×Welcome to Player FM!
Player FM is scanning the web for high-quality podcasts for you to enjoy right now. It's the best podcast app and works on Android, iPhone, and the web. Signup to sync subscriptions across devices.