Search a title or topic

Over 20 million podcasts, powered by 

Player FM logo
Artwork

Content provided by The European VC. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by The European VC or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://podcastplayer.com/legal.
Player FM - Podcast App
Go offline with the Player FM app!

E549 | EUVC Summit 2025 | Sarah Drinkwater (Common Magic) and Anthony Danon (Rerail): The Path to Success for European Micro Funds

14:54
 
Share
 

Manage episode 500563027 series 2968392
Content provided by The European VC. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by The European VC or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://podcastplayer.com/legal.

At the EUVC Summit 2025, Anthony and Sarah took the stage with what turned out to be one of the most intellectually charged exchanges of the day.

The topic? Solo GPs, specialization, and the hard choices that define fund performance.

Let’s just say—no consensus was reached. But the tension? That’s where the insight lived.

Anthony came in strong:

“Being a solo GP is the purest form of interest alignment.”

To him, solo GPs aren’t a stepping stone or niche play—they’re a category in their own right. The advantage? Focus. Speed. Zero overhead. And most importantly: a differentiated product founders want.

He highlighted what he sees as the compounding edge:

  • No IC.

  • No coordination cost.

  • Vertically integrated workflows.

  • A position as a complementary node, not a competitor, in the ecosystem.

And yes—there’s scale in solo too.

“I just had coffee with two solo GPs managing over a billion in AUM. You don't need to ‘scale up’ to be credible.”

Sarah offered a more grounded lens: focus on performance over scale.

“You don’t win on good ops alone—but you can lose on bad ops.”

Her point: it’s not about copying what works in another market. It's about right-sizing your fund to what your strategy and your market can actually sustain.

Especially in Europe, she argued, the path isn’t about chasing a 10x in AUM—it’s about finding the zone where your edge sings.

“If I think about the funds I admire, they got really good at finding the fund size that matched their true strategy.”

And for emerging managers, the key is still figuring out what the market needs now, not just what worked last cycle.

As the session wrapped, one line captured the spirit of it all:

“The test of a great intelligence is holding two opposing ideas at the same time.”

At EUVC, we didn’t just hear those ideas.
We saw them—sitting side by side on stage.

And if we’re smart about it, we won’t choose one or the other.
We’ll connect the dots.

The Case for the Solo GP: Pure Alignment, Compounding AdvantageThe Performance Perspective: Ops, Fund Size & Market FitTwo Views. Both True.

  continue reading

562 episodes

Artwork
iconShare
 
Manage episode 500563027 series 2968392
Content provided by The European VC. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by The European VC or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://podcastplayer.com/legal.

At the EUVC Summit 2025, Anthony and Sarah took the stage with what turned out to be one of the most intellectually charged exchanges of the day.

The topic? Solo GPs, specialization, and the hard choices that define fund performance.

Let’s just say—no consensus was reached. But the tension? That’s where the insight lived.

Anthony came in strong:

“Being a solo GP is the purest form of interest alignment.”

To him, solo GPs aren’t a stepping stone or niche play—they’re a category in their own right. The advantage? Focus. Speed. Zero overhead. And most importantly: a differentiated product founders want.

He highlighted what he sees as the compounding edge:

  • No IC.

  • No coordination cost.

  • Vertically integrated workflows.

  • A position as a complementary node, not a competitor, in the ecosystem.

And yes—there’s scale in solo too.

“I just had coffee with two solo GPs managing over a billion in AUM. You don't need to ‘scale up’ to be credible.”

Sarah offered a more grounded lens: focus on performance over scale.

“You don’t win on good ops alone—but you can lose on bad ops.”

Her point: it’s not about copying what works in another market. It's about right-sizing your fund to what your strategy and your market can actually sustain.

Especially in Europe, she argued, the path isn’t about chasing a 10x in AUM—it’s about finding the zone where your edge sings.

“If I think about the funds I admire, they got really good at finding the fund size that matched their true strategy.”

And for emerging managers, the key is still figuring out what the market needs now, not just what worked last cycle.

As the session wrapped, one line captured the spirit of it all:

“The test of a great intelligence is holding two opposing ideas at the same time.”

At EUVC, we didn’t just hear those ideas.
We saw them—sitting side by side on stage.

And if we’re smart about it, we won’t choose one or the other.
We’ll connect the dots.

The Case for the Solo GP: Pure Alignment, Compounding AdvantageThe Performance Perspective: Ops, Fund Size & Market FitTwo Views. Both True.

  continue reading

562 episodes

All episodes

×
 
Loading …

Welcome to Player FM!

Player FM is scanning the web for high-quality podcasts for you to enjoy right now. It's the best podcast app and works on Android, iPhone, and the web. Signup to sync subscriptions across devices.

 

Copyright 2025 | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | | Copyright
Listen to this show while you explore
Play