Search a title or topic

Over 20 million podcasts, powered by 

Player FM logo
Artwork

Content provided by DC and Dynamic Chiropractic. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by DC and Dynamic Chiropractic or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://podcastplayer.com/legal.
Player FM - Podcast App
Go offline with the Player FM app!

Montana Prescriptive Authority Bill Tabled in State

7:18
 
Share
 

Manage episode 489393196 series 3643436
Content provided by DC and Dynamic Chiropractic. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by DC and Dynamic Chiropractic or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://podcastplayer.com/legal.

Montana chiropractors recently faced a significant legislative hurdle as House Bill 929, which sought to grant them optional prescriptive authority, was tabled in the state Senate. Sponsored by Dr. Greg Oblander, a chiropractor and state representative, this pivotal bill aimed to empower Montana DCs to prescribe specific non-controlled, nonscheduled formulary drugs for musculoskeletal pain, including over-the-counter analgesics, NSAIDs, muscle relaxants, and various topical medications. Despite successfully passing House review on April 5, 2025, the legislation faced considerable opposition from organizations like the International Chiropractors Association and the Montana Medical Association, with malpractice insurers also noting inevitable rate increases if it became law.

A notable point of contention arose concerning the American Chiropractic Association's stance, where Dr. Oblander's testimony suggesting ACA support contrasted with the ACA's official position of neutrality on state-level legislation. Had the bill been enacted, chiropractors seeking this authority would have needed a special license endorsement from the state board, requiring extensive pharmacology education and adherence to new protocols. This isn't an isolated incident; Dr. Oblander previously sponsored similar legislation (H.B. 500) that narrowly failed earlier in 2025, underscoring that the battle over prescriptive authority in Montana is far from over, a debate set to resurface given the state's biennial legislative sessions.

  continue reading

50 episodes

Artwork
iconShare
 
Manage episode 489393196 series 3643436
Content provided by DC and Dynamic Chiropractic. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by DC and Dynamic Chiropractic or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://podcastplayer.com/legal.

Montana chiropractors recently faced a significant legislative hurdle as House Bill 929, which sought to grant them optional prescriptive authority, was tabled in the state Senate. Sponsored by Dr. Greg Oblander, a chiropractor and state representative, this pivotal bill aimed to empower Montana DCs to prescribe specific non-controlled, nonscheduled formulary drugs for musculoskeletal pain, including over-the-counter analgesics, NSAIDs, muscle relaxants, and various topical medications. Despite successfully passing House review on April 5, 2025, the legislation faced considerable opposition from organizations like the International Chiropractors Association and the Montana Medical Association, with malpractice insurers also noting inevitable rate increases if it became law.

A notable point of contention arose concerning the American Chiropractic Association's stance, where Dr. Oblander's testimony suggesting ACA support contrasted with the ACA's official position of neutrality on state-level legislation. Had the bill been enacted, chiropractors seeking this authority would have needed a special license endorsement from the state board, requiring extensive pharmacology education and adherence to new protocols. This isn't an isolated incident; Dr. Oblander previously sponsored similar legislation (H.B. 500) that narrowly failed earlier in 2025, underscoring that the battle over prescriptive authority in Montana is far from over, a debate set to resurface given the state's biennial legislative sessions.

  continue reading

50 episodes

All episodes

×
 
Loading …

Welcome to Player FM!

Player FM is scanning the web for high-quality podcasts for you to enjoy right now. It's the best podcast app and works on Android, iPhone, and the web. Signup to sync subscriptions across devices.

 

Copyright 2025 | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | | Copyright
Listen to this show while you explore
Play