))
What Do Privacy Scholars Maximize? – Law as a Practice and Law as a Science.
Manage episode 501724287 series 3664155
Content provided by Klaus Heine and Erasmus University Rotterdam. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Klaus Heine and Erasmus University Rotterdam or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://podcastplayer.com/legal.
Ignacio Cofone’s book “The Privacy Fallacy” is the starting point for a methodological discussion about how the notion of privacy is approached by law. It is distinguished between law as a practice and law as science. The first is a technique of conflict resolution, while the latter derives empirically testable hypotheses from a theory. In “The Privacy Fallacy” we find both. Epistemological problems arise when the two approaches are not analytically separated. This discussion is guided by the article ‘What do privacy scholars maximize? – Law as a practice and law as a science’, written by prof. Heine.
For the link of the publication of the article mentioned above, please click here.
8 episodes
Share
