Search a title or topic

Over 20 million podcasts, powered by 

Player FM logo
Artwork

Content provided by Darshan Kulkarni. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Darshan Kulkarni or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://podcastplayer.com/legal.
Player FM - Podcast App
Go offline with the Player FM app!

Payer Presentations Can Trigger Enforcement

6:00
 
Share
 

Manage episode 514410825 series 3506216
Content provided by Darshan Kulkarni. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Darshan Kulkarni or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://podcastplayer.com/legal.

The boundary between scientific exchange and marketing in payer presentations is increasingly blurred, creating significant compliance and enforcement risks. While payers demand real-world evidence, comparative studies, and economic models beyond FDA-approved labeling, manufacturers must ensure all shared information is truthful, non-misleading, properly contextualized, and backed by competent and reliable scientific evidence.

Key pitfalls include:

  1. Cherry-picking data without balanced limitations.

  2. Economic models presented without caveats or assumptions.

  3. Future indications framed as imminent rather than investigational.

Crossing into promotion can trigger FDA, FTC, OIG, DOJ, and plaintiff scrutiny, with false claims liability a real risk. To mitigate exposure, companies should:

  • Use clear disclaimers and transparent disclosures.

  • Involve compliance early in deck preparation.

  • Document rationale, recipients, and underlying assumptions.

  • Maintain audit trails through tools like Ceres Tracking.

The DOJ’s healthcare fraud task force has prioritized this area, making compliance essential not only to avoid regulatory letters but also subpoenas, litigation, and treble damages. Proper safeguards—including playbooks, legal review, and compliance monitoring—protect companies from costly enforcement actions.

Bottom line: Scientific exchange with payers is permitted and necessary, but once it drifts into marketing, companies face severe legal and financial consequences.

Support the show

  continue reading

284 episodes

Artwork
iconShare
 
Manage episode 514410825 series 3506216
Content provided by Darshan Kulkarni. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Darshan Kulkarni or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://podcastplayer.com/legal.

The boundary between scientific exchange and marketing in payer presentations is increasingly blurred, creating significant compliance and enforcement risks. While payers demand real-world evidence, comparative studies, and economic models beyond FDA-approved labeling, manufacturers must ensure all shared information is truthful, non-misleading, properly contextualized, and backed by competent and reliable scientific evidence.

Key pitfalls include:

  1. Cherry-picking data without balanced limitations.

  2. Economic models presented without caveats or assumptions.

  3. Future indications framed as imminent rather than investigational.

Crossing into promotion can trigger FDA, FTC, OIG, DOJ, and plaintiff scrutiny, with false claims liability a real risk. To mitigate exposure, companies should:

  • Use clear disclaimers and transparent disclosures.

  • Involve compliance early in deck preparation.

  • Document rationale, recipients, and underlying assumptions.

  • Maintain audit trails through tools like Ceres Tracking.

The DOJ’s healthcare fraud task force has prioritized this area, making compliance essential not only to avoid regulatory letters but also subpoenas, litigation, and treble damages. Proper safeguards—including playbooks, legal review, and compliance monitoring—protect companies from costly enforcement actions.

Bottom line: Scientific exchange with payers is permitted and necessary, but once it drifts into marketing, companies face severe legal and financial consequences.

Support the show

  continue reading

284 episodes

All episodes

×
 
Loading …

Welcome to Player FM!

Player FM is scanning the web for high-quality podcasts for you to enjoy right now. It's the best podcast app and works on Android, iPhone, and the web. Signup to sync subscriptions across devices.

 

Copyright 2025 | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | | Copyright
Listen to this show while you explore
Play