Russia State Sponsor of Terrorism? /Lt Col Daniel Davis & Patrick Henningsen

Daniel Davis Deep Dive

Content provided by Daniel Davis. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Daniel Davis or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.

8d ago 1:06:18

MP3•Episode home

Sen Lindsey Graham claims that in 2025 Russia has invaded Ukraine and allegedly taken ~19,546 Ukrainian children to Russia; some teenagers are being trained to fight for Russia.

Urgent moral call: make this practice unacceptable and take action to get the children returned.

Notes a US push (Lindsey Graham mentioned) to add Russia to the U.S. list of “state sponsors of terrorism” and to legislate new tools/sanctions to pressure Russia.

Guest (Patrick) strongly rejects that approach and labels Graham’s rhetoric “a raving lunatic” move — argues it’s a political stunt and counterproductive.

Contesting the numbers/claims: guest says the large abduction narrative has been “thoroughly debunked” and traces it to one academic report (from Yale) produced in absentia; claims much of the evidence is derivative and politicized.

Offers alternative account: many children were separated by war, came from group homes/orphanages, or were moved across the border with options offered (exfiltration/safe haven, or camp-like placements) — not necessarily mass kidnapping for militarization.

Mentions independent journalism (e.g., Grey Zone) that reportedly investigated and found the “camps” to be benign (music classes, holiday-camp style).

Places the proposal to designate Russia as a terror state in a pattern of Washington hoping sanctions/labels will eventually “break” adversaries — speaker thinks that strategy hasn’t worked and is unlikely to work against Russia.

Compares the situation to past Western campaigns (Syria) and explains why those cases differ — Syria’s breakdown involved many external actors and conditions that don’t map neatly onto Russia.

Argues that long-term sanctions and pressure have mixed results, and warns Washington’s repeated reliance on these playbooks (and hopes for a repeat of Cold War-style outcomes) is misguided.

Closing note: skepticism about the effectiveness and motives of U.S. policymakers pushing tougher labels and sanctions; the guest views the kidnapping narrative and resulting legal/political moves as politicized and unreliable.

One-line takeaway: the clip contrasts a raw moral alarm over children taken in the war with a guest’s counter-argument that the scale and nature of those claims are politicized and that labeling Russia a “state sponsor of terror” is both dubious and unlikely to achieve useful results.

See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

678 episodes

#Daniel Davis #Daily News #Politics #News Talk #News #Trump #Russia #Ukraine #MAGA