Search a title or topic

Over 20 million podcasts, powered by 

Player FM logo
Artwork

Content provided by Chinese Short Dialogue | 听中文会话 | 中国語会話を聴く. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Chinese Short Dialogue | 听中文会话 | 中国語会話を聴く or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://podcastplayer.com/legal.
Player FM - Podcast App
Go offline with the Player FM app!

银行存款安全谁负责? - Who Is Responsible for Bank Deposit Safety? [HSK 5]

1:42
 
Share
 

Manage episode 501806367 series 3596046
Content provided by Chinese Short Dialogue | 听中文会话 | 中国語会話を聴く. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Chinese Short Dialogue | 听中文会话 | 中国語会話を聴く or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://podcastplayer.com/legal.

黄刚 and 陈花 discuss a bank deposit disappearance case, reflecting on bank responsibility and depositor risk awareness.

Download the app here:

Available in 8 languages on the app:

Learn Chinese | 중국어 배우기 | 中国語を学ぶ | Изучать китайский язык | Học tiếng Trung | Belajar bahasa Mandarin | Aprender chino | تعلم اللغة الصينية

《English Translation》

黄刚: Xiao Hua, did you see today's news? The trial for the 250 million yuan deposit disappearance at ICBC Nanning branch started today. The lawyer said the bank’s internal controls had major issues.
陈花: I saw it! I was really shocked. Aren’t banks supposed to be the safest place? How could insiders steal depositors' money?
黄刚: The key point is that the bank's internal control system was basically useless. The depositor’s money was taken out just 45 minutes after it was deposited, transferred by internal staff through fake procedures. What’s worse, the banking regulator gave 11 consecutive warnings, but the bank ignored them.
陈花: That's outrageous! But I also saw that the bank claimed the depositor was greedy for high interest and trusted staff too easily, giving them both their password and ID, so the bank says it isn’t responsible.
黄刚: That's exactly the issue. As a financial institution, a bank's most basic duty is to safeguard depositors’ funds. Even if customers make mistakes, the bank’s internal controls should never completely fail.
陈花: Right, this case is a reminder that depositors also need to be cautious and not trust any individual too much. When handling procedures, you must follow official processes to avoid unnecessary risks.
黄刚: Exactly. Both banks and depositors need to reflect. This should be a wake-up call for banks—to improve internal controls and strengthen legal and ethical training for employees, so incidents like this don’t happen again.

  continue reading

78 episodes

Artwork
iconShare
 
Manage episode 501806367 series 3596046
Content provided by Chinese Short Dialogue | 听中文会话 | 中国語会話を聴く. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Chinese Short Dialogue | 听中文会话 | 中国語会話を聴く or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://podcastplayer.com/legal.

黄刚 and 陈花 discuss a bank deposit disappearance case, reflecting on bank responsibility and depositor risk awareness.

Download the app here:

Available in 8 languages on the app:

Learn Chinese | 중국어 배우기 | 中国語を学ぶ | Изучать китайский язык | Học tiếng Trung | Belajar bahasa Mandarin | Aprender chino | تعلم اللغة الصينية

《English Translation》

黄刚: Xiao Hua, did you see today's news? The trial for the 250 million yuan deposit disappearance at ICBC Nanning branch started today. The lawyer said the bank’s internal controls had major issues.
陈花: I saw it! I was really shocked. Aren’t banks supposed to be the safest place? How could insiders steal depositors' money?
黄刚: The key point is that the bank's internal control system was basically useless. The depositor’s money was taken out just 45 minutes after it was deposited, transferred by internal staff through fake procedures. What’s worse, the banking regulator gave 11 consecutive warnings, but the bank ignored them.
陈花: That's outrageous! But I also saw that the bank claimed the depositor was greedy for high interest and trusted staff too easily, giving them both their password and ID, so the bank says it isn’t responsible.
黄刚: That's exactly the issue. As a financial institution, a bank's most basic duty is to safeguard depositors’ funds. Even if customers make mistakes, the bank’s internal controls should never completely fail.
陈花: Right, this case is a reminder that depositors also need to be cautious and not trust any individual too much. When handling procedures, you must follow official processes to avoid unnecessary risks.
黄刚: Exactly. Both banks and depositors need to reflect. This should be a wake-up call for banks—to improve internal controls and strengthen legal and ethical training for employees, so incidents like this don’t happen again.

  continue reading

78 episodes

All episodes

×
 
Loading …

Welcome to Player FM!

Player FM is scanning the web for high-quality podcasts for you to enjoy right now. It's the best podcast app and works on Android, iPhone, and the web. Signup to sync subscriptions across devices.

 

Copyright 2025 | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | | Copyright
Listen to this show while you explore
Play