Search a title or topic

Over 20 million podcasts, powered by 

Player FM logo
Artwork

Content provided by Chinese Short Dialogue | 听中文会话 | 中国語会話を聴く. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Chinese Short Dialogue | 听中文会话 | 中国語会話を聴く or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.
Player FM - Podcast App
Go offline with the Player FM app!

取消高考真的合理吗? - Is Cancelling the Gaokao Really Reasonable? [HSK 6]

1:47
 
Share
 

Manage episode 479967271 series 3596046
Content provided by Chinese Short Dialogue | 听中文会话 | 中国語会話を聴く. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Chinese Short Dialogue | 听中文会话 | 中国語会話を聴く or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://podcastplayer.com/legal.

A proposal by a CPPCC member to cancel the Gaokao has sparked discussions on educational fairness and talent selection.

Download the app here:

Available in 8 languages on the app:

Learn Chinese | 중국어 배우기 | 中国語を学ぶ | Изучать китайский язык | Học tiếng Trung | Belajar bahasa Mandarin | Aprender chino | تعلم اللغة الصينية

《English Translation》

陈花: Honey, did you see the news? A CPPCC member proposed canceling the Gaokao and allowing everyone to go to university directly!
黄刚: Yes, I saw it. His reasoning is that the Gaokao creates too much pressure, affecting students' development. Plus, university enrollment rates are already high, so why not let everyone go to university?
陈花: It sounds good. Students wouldn’t have to cram for extra classes or worry about a single exam affecting their entire future.
黄刚: But the problem is, without the Gaokao, how would universities select students? If they switch to a comprehensive evaluation, urban students would have an advantage over rural students, which could worsen the inequality in education resources.
陈花: That’s true. Also, he suggested shortening primary, middle, and high school education to a total of nine years so students can enter university earlier. Is that really feasible?
黄刚: That would mean students have to complete all fundamental knowledge in a much shorter time, especially in science subjects. The learning pressure might actually increase.
陈花: Another issue is, if everyone can go to university, wouldn’t the quality of higher education decline? University degrees might lose their value, and job competition could become even tougher.
黄刚: Exactly, this relates to the issue of 'degree inflation.' While the Gaokao has its flaws, it is still a relatively fair selection system. Completely canceling it might create new problems.
陈花: It seems like this proposal has some idealistic aspects, but implementing it in reality would be quite challenging.
黄刚: That's right. Education reform shouldn't be one-size-fits-all; we need to find a balance between fairness and efficiency.

  continue reading

21 episodes

Artwork
iconShare
 
Manage episode 479967271 series 3596046
Content provided by Chinese Short Dialogue | 听中文会话 | 中国語会話を聴く. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Chinese Short Dialogue | 听中文会话 | 中国語会話を聴く or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://podcastplayer.com/legal.

A proposal by a CPPCC member to cancel the Gaokao has sparked discussions on educational fairness and talent selection.

Download the app here:

Available in 8 languages on the app:

Learn Chinese | 중국어 배우기 | 中国語を学ぶ | Изучать китайский язык | Học tiếng Trung | Belajar bahasa Mandarin | Aprender chino | تعلم اللغة الصينية

《English Translation》

陈花: Honey, did you see the news? A CPPCC member proposed canceling the Gaokao and allowing everyone to go to university directly!
黄刚: Yes, I saw it. His reasoning is that the Gaokao creates too much pressure, affecting students' development. Plus, university enrollment rates are already high, so why not let everyone go to university?
陈花: It sounds good. Students wouldn’t have to cram for extra classes or worry about a single exam affecting their entire future.
黄刚: But the problem is, without the Gaokao, how would universities select students? If they switch to a comprehensive evaluation, urban students would have an advantage over rural students, which could worsen the inequality in education resources.
陈花: That’s true. Also, he suggested shortening primary, middle, and high school education to a total of nine years so students can enter university earlier. Is that really feasible?
黄刚: That would mean students have to complete all fundamental knowledge in a much shorter time, especially in science subjects. The learning pressure might actually increase.
陈花: Another issue is, if everyone can go to university, wouldn’t the quality of higher education decline? University degrees might lose their value, and job competition could become even tougher.
黄刚: Exactly, this relates to the issue of 'degree inflation.' While the Gaokao has its flaws, it is still a relatively fair selection system. Completely canceling it might create new problems.
陈花: It seems like this proposal has some idealistic aspects, but implementing it in reality would be quite challenging.
黄刚: That's right. Education reform shouldn't be one-size-fits-all; we need to find a balance between fairness and efficiency.

  continue reading

21 episodes

All episodes

×
 
Loading …

Welcome to Player FM!

Player FM is scanning the web for high-quality podcasts for you to enjoy right now. It's the best podcast app and works on Android, iPhone, and the web. Signup to sync subscriptions across devices.

 

Listen to this show while you explore
Play