Search a title or topic

Over 20 million podcasts, powered by 

Player FM logo
Artwork

Content provided by NZME and Newstalk ZB. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by NZME and Newstalk ZB or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://podcastplayer.com/legal.
Player FM - Podcast App
Go offline with the Player FM app!

John MacDonald: I asked an AI bot how it felt about marking exams

6:15
 
Share
 

Manage episode 498539073 series 3032727
Content provided by NZME and Newstalk ZB. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by NZME and Newstalk ZB or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://podcastplayer.com/legal.

With the Government wanting artificial intelligence to be used to mark high school exams, I asked a ChatGPT bot how it felt about that.

And here’s what it said: "If the Government were to ask me to mark high school exams, I would feel (if I could feel) cautious optimism, with a big dose of responsible hesitation."

The bot said, on the upside, it could process thousands of scripts quickly, never get tired, and not suffer from the end-of-day brain fog that human markers do. It also wouldn't mark one student generously and another harshly on a bad day. And it could apply marking schedules with perfect consistency.

The bot also said there would be downsides. It said exam answers aren’t always clean-cut. A brilliant, unconventional insight might not fit the marking template, but a good teacher sees its value. That’s harder for AI to interpret correctly without "massive nuance training".

It said AI can reflect biases in its training data. Even small disparities in language use, cultural references, or phrasing could disadvantage students if the system isn’t carefully designed and constantly audited.

The ChatGPT bot also told me students, parents, and teachers would rightly ask how something was marked, and public confidence could be eroded.

It said, on balance, it would be in favour of "hybrid marking”, with AI doing pre-marking and humans handling the grey areas and double-checking. So AI would be a support tool.

In short, the AI bot said: "I’m capable. But I shouldn’t be trusted alone. Exam marking is too important to hand over fully to a machine - at least not yet."

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

  continue reading

1067 episodes

Artwork
iconShare
 
Manage episode 498539073 series 3032727
Content provided by NZME and Newstalk ZB. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by NZME and Newstalk ZB or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://podcastplayer.com/legal.

With the Government wanting artificial intelligence to be used to mark high school exams, I asked a ChatGPT bot how it felt about that.

And here’s what it said: "If the Government were to ask me to mark high school exams, I would feel (if I could feel) cautious optimism, with a big dose of responsible hesitation."

The bot said, on the upside, it could process thousands of scripts quickly, never get tired, and not suffer from the end-of-day brain fog that human markers do. It also wouldn't mark one student generously and another harshly on a bad day. And it could apply marking schedules with perfect consistency.

The bot also said there would be downsides. It said exam answers aren’t always clean-cut. A brilliant, unconventional insight might not fit the marking template, but a good teacher sees its value. That’s harder for AI to interpret correctly without "massive nuance training".

It said AI can reflect biases in its training data. Even small disparities in language use, cultural references, or phrasing could disadvantage students if the system isn’t carefully designed and constantly audited.

The ChatGPT bot also told me students, parents, and teachers would rightly ask how something was marked, and public confidence could be eroded.

It said, on balance, it would be in favour of "hybrid marking”, with AI doing pre-marking and humans handling the grey areas and double-checking. So AI would be a support tool.

In short, the AI bot said: "I’m capable. But I shouldn’t be trusted alone. Exam marking is too important to hand over fully to a machine - at least not yet."

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

  continue reading

1067 episodes

Semua episod

×
 
Loading …

Welcome to Player FM!

Player FM is scanning the web for high-quality podcasts for you to enjoy right now. It's the best podcast app and works on Android, iPhone, and the web. Signup to sync subscriptions across devices.

 

Copyright 2025 | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | | Copyright
Listen to this show while you explore
Play