Search a title or topic

Over 20 million podcasts, powered by 

Player FM logo
Artwork

Content provided by with Leah Pierson and Sophie Gibert, With Leah Pierson, and Sophie Gibert. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by with Leah Pierson and Sophie Gibert, With Leah Pierson, and Sophie Gibert or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://podcastplayer.com/legal.
Player FM - Podcast App
Go offline with the Player FM app!

#13 Sarah McGrath: Are there moral experts?

1:18:50
 
Share
 

Manage episode 452255808 series 3503557
Content provided by with Leah Pierson and Sophie Gibert, With Leah Pierson, and Sophie Gibert. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by with Leah Pierson and Sophie Gibert, With Leah Pierson, and Sophie Gibert or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://podcastplayer.com/legal.

In this episode, we speak with Dr. Sarah McGrath, professor of philosophy at Princeton University. We discuss whether and when it makes sense to defer to others about the answers to moral questions, whether moral deference is any less appropriate than deference in other domains, like math or science, and whether we have reason to think bioethicists are moral experts.

(00:00) Our introduction
(04:28) Interview begins
(08:02) Varieties of moral deference: pure versus impure
(12:39) Outline of Sarah’s view and argument
(20:58) The (ir)relevance of meta-ethics (what ethics is and where it comes from)
(41:13) How to identify moral experts
(50:37) Are utilitarians likely to be moral experts?
(52:32) Does education in moral philosophy make you an expert?
(1:01:18) Practical implications: endowing bioethicists with authority
(1:14:55) Why talk of optimism and pessimism is misguided

Mentioned or referenced:

Bio(un)ethical is a bioethics podcast written by Leah Pierson and Sophie Gibert, with editing and production by Ambedo Media (previous production support by Audiolift.co). Our music is written by Nina Khoury and performed by Social Skills. We are supported by a grant from Amplify Creative Grants.

  continue reading

Chapters

1. #13 Sarah McGrath: Are there moral experts? (00:00:00)

2. Interview begins (00:04:28)

3. Varieties of moral deference (00:08:02)

4. Outline of Sarah's view and argument (00:12:39)

5. The (ir)relevance of meta-ethics (what ethics is and where it comes from) (00:20:58)

6. How to identify moral experts (00:41:13)

7. Are utilitarians likely to be moral experts? (00:50:37)

8. Does education in moral philosophy make you an expert? (00:52:32)

9. Practical implications: endowing bioethicists with authority (01:01:18)

10. Why talk of optimism and pessimism is misguided (01:14:55)

22 episodes

Artwork
iconShare
 
Manage episode 452255808 series 3503557
Content provided by with Leah Pierson and Sophie Gibert, With Leah Pierson, and Sophie Gibert. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by with Leah Pierson and Sophie Gibert, With Leah Pierson, and Sophie Gibert or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://podcastplayer.com/legal.

In this episode, we speak with Dr. Sarah McGrath, professor of philosophy at Princeton University. We discuss whether and when it makes sense to defer to others about the answers to moral questions, whether moral deference is any less appropriate than deference in other domains, like math or science, and whether we have reason to think bioethicists are moral experts.

(00:00) Our introduction
(04:28) Interview begins
(08:02) Varieties of moral deference: pure versus impure
(12:39) Outline of Sarah’s view and argument
(20:58) The (ir)relevance of meta-ethics (what ethics is and where it comes from)
(41:13) How to identify moral experts
(50:37) Are utilitarians likely to be moral experts?
(52:32) Does education in moral philosophy make you an expert?
(1:01:18) Practical implications: endowing bioethicists with authority
(1:14:55) Why talk of optimism and pessimism is misguided

Mentioned or referenced:

Bio(un)ethical is a bioethics podcast written by Leah Pierson and Sophie Gibert, with editing and production by Ambedo Media (previous production support by Audiolift.co). Our music is written by Nina Khoury and performed by Social Skills. We are supported by a grant from Amplify Creative Grants.

  continue reading

Chapters

1. #13 Sarah McGrath: Are there moral experts? (00:00:00)

2. Interview begins (00:04:28)

3. Varieties of moral deference (00:08:02)

4. Outline of Sarah's view and argument (00:12:39)

5. The (ir)relevance of meta-ethics (what ethics is and where it comes from) (00:20:58)

6. How to identify moral experts (00:41:13)

7. Are utilitarians likely to be moral experts? (00:50:37)

8. Does education in moral philosophy make you an expert? (00:52:32)

9. Practical implications: endowing bioethicists with authority (01:01:18)

10. Why talk of optimism and pessimism is misguided (01:14:55)

22 episodes

Усі епізоди

×
 
Loading …

Welcome to Player FM!

Player FM is scanning the web for high-quality podcasts for you to enjoy right now. It's the best podcast app and works on Android, iPhone, and the web. Signup to sync subscriptions across devices.

 

Copyright 2025 | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | | Copyright
Listen to this show while you explore
Play