Home to the Spectator's best podcasts on everything from politics to religion, literature to food and drink, and more. A new podcast every day from writers worth listening to.
…
continue reading
Content provided by Bobby Capucci. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Bobby Capucci or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.
Player FM - Podcast App
Go offline with the Player FM app!
Go offline with the Player FM app!
Prosecutors Hit Back At Diddy's Laptop Claims In Their Response To The Judge
MP3•Episode home
Manage episode 489600825 series 2987886
Content provided by Bobby Capucci. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Bobby Capucci or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://podcastplayer.com/legal.
In the case of United States v. Sean Combs, 24 Cr. 542 (AS), the Government has responded to the defendant's recent claims regarding access to a laptop for reviewing discovery materials and the sharing of attorney visitation forms at the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC) Brooklyn. The Government asserts that the defendant's requests for relief are either premature or moot. They argue that the MDC has provided the necessary accommodations to allow Combs to review discovery materials, implying that his access to resources for preparing his defense has not been unduly hinder.
Additionally, the Government addresses the issue of attorney visitation forms, arguing that there is no substantiated infringement of Combs' rights in this regard. They contend that the provision of these forms does not amount to a breach of attorney-client privilege or impede the defendant’s legal defense. By positioning the defendant's concerns as unwarranted at this stage, the Government suggests that the existing measures at MDC are adequate and that Combs' allegations lack sufficient merit to justify judicial intervention at this time.
(commercial at 8:16)
to contact me:
[email protected]
source:
gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.99.0.pdf
…
continue reading
Additionally, the Government addresses the issue of attorney visitation forms, arguing that there is no substantiated infringement of Combs' rights in this regard. They contend that the provision of these forms does not amount to a breach of attorney-client privilege or impede the defendant’s legal defense. By positioning the defendant's concerns as unwarranted at this stage, the Government suggests that the existing measures at MDC are adequate and that Combs' allegations lack sufficient merit to justify judicial intervention at this time.
(commercial at 8:16)
to contact me:
[email protected]
source:
gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.99.0.pdf
1101 episodes
MP3•Episode home
Manage episode 489600825 series 2987886
Content provided by Bobby Capucci. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Bobby Capucci or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://podcastplayer.com/legal.
In the case of United States v. Sean Combs, 24 Cr. 542 (AS), the Government has responded to the defendant's recent claims regarding access to a laptop for reviewing discovery materials and the sharing of attorney visitation forms at the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC) Brooklyn. The Government asserts that the defendant's requests for relief are either premature or moot. They argue that the MDC has provided the necessary accommodations to allow Combs to review discovery materials, implying that his access to resources for preparing his defense has not been unduly hinder.
Additionally, the Government addresses the issue of attorney visitation forms, arguing that there is no substantiated infringement of Combs' rights in this regard. They contend that the provision of these forms does not amount to a breach of attorney-client privilege or impede the defendant’s legal defense. By positioning the defendant's concerns as unwarranted at this stage, the Government suggests that the existing measures at MDC are adequate and that Combs' allegations lack sufficient merit to justify judicial intervention at this time.
(commercial at 8:16)
to contact me:
[email protected]
source:
gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.99.0.pdf
…
continue reading
Additionally, the Government addresses the issue of attorney visitation forms, arguing that there is no substantiated infringement of Combs' rights in this regard. They contend that the provision of these forms does not amount to a breach of attorney-client privilege or impede the defendant’s legal defense. By positioning the defendant's concerns as unwarranted at this stage, the Government suggests that the existing measures at MDC are adequate and that Combs' allegations lack sufficient merit to justify judicial intervention at this time.
(commercial at 8:16)
to contact me:
[email protected]
source:
gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.99.0.pdf
1101 episodes
All episodes
×Welcome to Player FM!
Player FM is scanning the web for high-quality podcasts for you to enjoy right now. It's the best podcast app and works on Android, iPhone, and the web. Signup to sync subscriptions across devices.