A political killing, a social media pile-on, and a bigger question: how free is free speech when your boss is watching? We crack open a local tequila and dive into the week’s most volatile story with clear eyes and real talk—no shouting, no dunking, just a hard look at what the First Amendment protects, what it doesn’t, and why at‑will employment turns tweets into career risks. From the vice president’s call to “name and report” to hundreds of people losing jobs over posts, we ask where accountability ends and petty punishment begins.
We map the actual boundaries—FCC rules, George Carlin’s seven dirty words, landmark cases on symbolic speech—and contrast U.S. standards with countries where online comments can trigger arrests. Then we shift from politics to people: mental health. The alleged shooter’s behavior reads less like a manifesto and more like untreated distress. We talk access, insurance, and why investing in care would do more to prevent violence than any new speech code. Along the way, we confront AI fakes, chopped clips, and the way algorithms reward outrage while starving nuance.
What do we suggest instead? Curate a wider media diet. Debate in good faith. Choose “change the channel” over “call their boss” when you can. And when you can’t agree, say so and move on. The goal isn’t to sanitize speech; it’s to rebuild the muscle for respectful dissent. We close with something simple and urgent: check on your people. If someone seems off, reach out. Kind questions beat hot takes every time.
If this conversation hits home, share it with a friend, subscribe for more thoughtful shows, and leave a review with your take: should employers police personal posts? We want to hear you.

Support the show