Go offline with the Player FM app!
Highlights: #204 – Nate Silver on making sense of SBF, and his biggest critiques of effective altruism
Fetch error
Hmmm there seems to be a problem fetching this series right now. Last successful fetch was on September 05, 2025 16:49 ()
What now? This series will be checked again in the next day. If you believe it should be working, please verify the publisher's feed link below is valid and includes actual episode links. You can contact support to request the feed be immediately fetched.
Manage episode 447626445 series 3320433
Election forecaster Nate Silver gives his takes on: how effective altruism could be better, the stark tradeoffs we faced with COVID, whether the 13 Keys to the White House is "junk science," how to tell whose election predictions are better, and if venture capitalists really take risks.
This is a selection of highlights from episode #204 of The 80,000 Hours Podcast: Nate Silver on making sense of SBF, and his biggest critiques of effective altruism. These aren't necessarily the most important, or even most entertaining parts of the interview — so if you enjoy this, we strongly recommend checking out the full episode.
And if you're finding these highlights episodes valuable, please let us know by emailing [email protected].
Highlights:
- Rob’s intro (00:00:00)
- Is anyone doing better at "doing good better"? (00:00:29)
- Is effective altruism too big to succeed? (00:02:19)
- The stark tradeoffs we faced with COVID (00:06:02)
- The 13 Keys to the White House (00:07:53)
- Can we tell whose election predictions are better? (00:11:40)
- Do venture capitalists really take risks? (00:16:29)
Highlights put together by Simon Monsour, Milo McGuire, and Dominic Armstrong
110 episodes
Fetch error
Hmmm there seems to be a problem fetching this series right now. Last successful fetch was on September 05, 2025 16:49 ()
What now? This series will be checked again in the next day. If you believe it should be working, please verify the publisher's feed link below is valid and includes actual episode links. You can contact support to request the feed be immediately fetched.
Manage episode 447626445 series 3320433
Election forecaster Nate Silver gives his takes on: how effective altruism could be better, the stark tradeoffs we faced with COVID, whether the 13 Keys to the White House is "junk science," how to tell whose election predictions are better, and if venture capitalists really take risks.
This is a selection of highlights from episode #204 of The 80,000 Hours Podcast: Nate Silver on making sense of SBF, and his biggest critiques of effective altruism. These aren't necessarily the most important, or even most entertaining parts of the interview — so if you enjoy this, we strongly recommend checking out the full episode.
And if you're finding these highlights episodes valuable, please let us know by emailing [email protected].
Highlights:
- Rob’s intro (00:00:00)
- Is anyone doing better at "doing good better"? (00:00:29)
- Is effective altruism too big to succeed? (00:02:19)
- The stark tradeoffs we faced with COVID (00:06:02)
- The 13 Keys to the White House (00:07:53)
- Can we tell whose election predictions are better? (00:11:40)
- Do venture capitalists really take risks? (00:16:29)
Highlights put together by Simon Monsour, Milo McGuire, and Dominic Armstrong
110 episodes
Όλα τα επεισόδια
×Welcome to Player FM!
Player FM is scanning the web for high-quality podcasts for you to enjoy right now. It's the best podcast app and works on Android, iPhone, and the web. Signup to sync subscriptions across devices.